Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

(Comma separation for multiple addresses)
Your Message:

Process over presumption: The Vermont encryption key decision

Judge's PGP encryption decision breeds controversy in the blogosphere
Security Strategies Alert By M. E. Kabay , Network World , 03/18/2008
Sign up for this newsletter now!

Mich Kabay takes a high-level view of security issues and provides resources to help safeguard your corporate and personal security.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

On Dec. 17, 2006, Canadian citizen and legal U.S. resident Sebastian Boucher crossed the U.S. border into Vermont at Derby Line. A U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent inspected the 30-year-old man's computer and reportedly found pornography and - significantly for this case - child pornography on the Z: drive. The laptop was seized as evidence and Sebastian Boucher was charged with transporting child pornography across interstate borders. Two days later, when agents tried to access the Z: drive, they found that it was encrypted using PGP.

In the course of 2007, a grand jury issued a subpoena ordering the accused to divulge his PGP encryption key; that subpoena was overruled on Nov. 20 by U.S. Magistrate Judge Jerome Niedermeier.

The case has created a wave of impassioned debate in the blogosphere, much of it consisting of abuse hurled at the defendant and contempt heaped upon the judge for letting a child pornographer go unpunished; a typical example of that kind of commentary, complete with original spelling, grammar and punctuation, is:

“What are they thinking? This is our children. We should do everything to put children pornographers behind bars, along with the pedophiles!!!! They have the laptop already, they have the evidence. This Judge needs to wake up and do the job he was hired to do. ‘My own opinion may the should check on all the people that agree with this decision!’"

More reasoned analysis can be found in Declan McCullagh’s review from Dec. 14, and in an excellent interview with a number of legal scholars by John Curran of Associated Press from Feb. 7, 2008, and I will not repeat their work here.

There are some implications of this decision if it is borne out on appeal. First, for corporate security managers, teach all employees what security specialists have been repeating for years: don’t carry sensitive materials across borders and don’t think that encryption will protect your laptop against seizure by border police. We have long known that many countries regard encryption on laptops with suspicion; in France, for example, “the government has access to private encryption keys, import and export of encryption software are restricted, and strict sanctions are imposed for using cryptographic techniques to commit a crime.” 

M. E. Kabay, PhD, CISSP-ISSMP, specializes in security and operations management consulting services. CV online.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print
Comments (9)
Login
Forgot your account info?

Process / PresumptionBy Anonymous on March 18, 2008, 1:14 pmBravo, Mitch! Of course, I won't be surprised if you get trashed for espousing a fundamentalist, rational view of these issues. I am always surprised and...

Reply | Read entire comment

"I've got nothing to hide..."By dan_linder on March 18, 2008, 1:45 pmThat quote is also the beginning of a document by Daniel Solove from the George Washing University Law School. In it, he poses this question: can I see your credit...

Reply | Read entire comment

Be Carfeful with the last sentenceBy michaeljmorris on March 19, 2008, 1:47 pmYou wrote "I hope that these principles will return to our country and that we will see habeas corpus restored, secret trials condemned and torture repudiated. " Show...

Reply | Read entire comment

Suspension of habeas corpusBy M. E. Kabay, PhD, CISSP-ISSMP on March 22, 2008, 8:45 pm-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 How do you know someone is a terrorist until you present evidence to support the accusation? For more information...

Reply | Read entire comment

YawnBy michaeljmorris on March 23, 2008, 7:09 amOh, please. My heart goes out to terrorists at Guantánamo Bay who have had to live with 3 meals a day for the last 5 years. THESE PEOPLE ARE TERRORIST! During...

Reply | Read entire comment

Stand up for the ConstitutionBy Anonymous on March 24, 2008, 10:32 amIt's appalling to see what we've allowed to happen in our fear and revulsion: and we continue to support the erosion and eventual demise of the constitution and...

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed