Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

(Comma separation for multiple addresses)
Your Message:

Bad business model: Turning subscriptions into gambling

The wrong way to sell music online
Security Strategies Alert By M. E. Kabay , Network World , 09/11/2008
Sign up for this newsletter now!

Mich Kabay takes a high-level view of security issues and provides resources to help safeguard your corporate and personal security.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Dear Unnamed_Music_Service:

I visited your site after seeing the ad in The Nation magazine. After I read your terms of service and your rate scale, I decided not to sign up (and, not incidentally, NOT to steal your 25 free songs by canceling at once). I thought you might like to know why.

Your subscriptions charge monthly fees (or yearly fees) and force users to lose their unused downloads at the end of each month. You have transformed a straightforward financial arrangement into a gambling routine.

Were it not for that stipulation, I'd gladly use your service. But the prospect of paying for music I don't download because I happen to be too busy in a particular month to visit your site and force myself to buy stuff does not appeal to me.

I have been teaching strategic applications of information technology since the 1980s and have been a programmer since 1965; I think your business model illustrates a poor grasp of how to use technology to your advantage.

It's not as if our not buying the stipulated number of songs in a month costs you anything: on the contrary, you get free use of our money without having to give anything up.

Why not reconsider your terms? Why not let your accounting system simply keep increasing the total number of downloads if someone pays but doesn't use the service for a while? Why have any cutoff at all – what have you got to lose? Your computer programs can easily be set to handle such accounting, and you wouldn't lose anything at all.

The business model that forces customers not to pile up huge numbers of unused credits for subscription products is rooted in real-world, physical inventory. Allowing someone to build up an enormous supply of credit that they can cash in at any time could exhaust supplies of the products they buy, leaving a store unable to supply other customers. But that issue simply does not apply to electronic intellectual property. You don't run out of copies of songs because someone buys 3,600 songs all at once after a year of accumulating credits.

Yes, you would have to pay royalties on the huge purchases, but if you set aside a portion of the unused credits to cover the necessary future expenditures, that money would earn interest while it waits. You could draw on your reserves to pay for the sudden bursts of purchasing if that’s what happens.

M. E. Kabay, PhD, CISSP-ISSMP, specializes in security and operations management consulting services. CV online.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print
Comments (5)
Login
Forgot your account info?

Re: Bad Business ModelBy prest on September 11, 2008, 10:01 amNever heard it expressed more lucidly, more compelling or more eloquently!!! Listen you think they would. Not.

Reply | Read entire comment

Hmmm... just like cell phone plans!By Anonymous on September 11, 2008, 1:22 pmI have not read the details, but from your description, their business model is not unlike the cell phone industry. For example, Verizon is the only reliable wireless...

Reply | Read entire comment

The prob may be accounting regulations post Enron.By danbrks on September 11, 2008, 1:46 pmIn an effort to ensure that people in the US can never get cheated again in another Enron scam GAAP (An accounting term) was changed so that no company may claim...

Reply | Read entire comment

Very appropriate post !!By raghuvamshi on September 12, 2008, 4:53 amYes, shouldn't the same be applied for cell phone plans too ??

Reply | Read entire comment

Sounds like a standard business model to me...By Anonymous on September 12, 2008, 8:51 amDr. Kabay, While I tend to agree with the vast majority of your articles, and that I would prefer to see the contract as you suggest, this is pretty standard operating...

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed