- How to use electrical outlets and cheap lasers to steal data
- The botnet world is booming
- NTIA seeks volunteers to review broadband applications
- The 10 dumbest mistakes network managers make
- What's driving this university to IPv6? Going green
Mich Kabay takes a high-level view of security issues and provides resources to help safeguard your corporate and personal security.
In the previous three columns, I've reported on discussions and correspondence with staff members at Microsoft headquarters about problems I perceived in the Microsoft Office Fluent User Interface, the new style of menus for Office 2007 products.
My initial reactions to the new interface were hostile and contemptuous. I assumed that the designers had ruined a perfectly useful interface with no regard to the retraining costs required to get used to the new system of symbols. I railed against rigid programmers who know better than to let users adapt the interface to their own preferences. Arrogant swine: typical Microsoft!
Now, following an exemplary correspondence from Microsoft expert Mark Alexieff, senior product manager for Microsoft Office, it seems to me that the arrogance lay in my assumptions rather than in Microsoft’s. Contrary to my assumptions, there is evidence that the new user interface is working and users are mostly happy with it.
I do think it might be interesting for Microsoft to do a correlation analysis between the degree of satisfaction in various dimensions and the initial level of competence of the user. In my case, with my obsessive-compulsive personality, I had created highly personalized, ultra-efficient toolbars reflecting my most-frequently used functions and with icons adapted to allow rapid differentiation among similar functions.
I still don't understand why the personalized “Quick Access Toolbar” should be restricted to a single row and prevented from relocation. For example, I use a 19-inch vertically oriented screen with more room for the Quick Access Toolbar along one vertical side than across the top of the screen. Perhaps this account of a productive and polite correspondence will stimulate ideas for increased flexibility in the user interface without compromising the benefits described in the research summarized in the preceding articles.
But these picky details are not the main point of today’s article. I was delighted with the depth and promptness of response to my concerns and I thank and congratulate Alexieff and the Microsoft Office PR representative (who asked to remain unnamed) for their customer orientation and courtesy.
From a more general perspective, Alexieff’s response illustrates some prime principles for all of us involved in managing security services (and support services of all kinds):
M. E. Kabay, PhD, CISSP-ISSMP, specializes in security and operations management consulting services. CV online.
Comments (8)
Power user's thoughtsBy Anonymous on November 26, 2008, 3:01 pmI have been using MS Office since its inception. I hate the new interface in Office 2007. I tried to help my daughter with a term paper while she was on break...
Reply | Read entire comment
Impact on Admin Support StaffsBy Anonymous on October 27, 2008, 4:42 pmI'm not comfortable at all with the new "friendly" Ribbon interface; unfortunately, neither are the 100+ secretarial staff that we support. To date virtually all...
Reply | Read entire comment
Called as Ribbon - By Anonymous on October 26, 2008, 10:15 pmThe new UI in Office 2007, and many other office products was tough initially to adapt from office 2003, but is much more easy and efficient to use.
Reply | Read entire comment
Let's have a real poll!By JohnBoi on October 24, 2008, 10:16 amNetwork World has enough readers that would chime in on this. Real users with experience that utilize the lesser known features of the apps. I hate the new...
Reply | Read entire comment
2007 UIBy Anonymous on October 23, 2008, 2:19 pmI was most disapointed in this series of articles. I expected something in the line of information from real 'user test groups', statistics, the need for change,...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments