Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

(Comma separation for multiple addresses)
Your Message:

Kraken the botnet: The ethics of counter-hacking

Why TippingPoint held back from destroying the Kraken botnet
Security Strategies Alert By M. E. Kabay , Network World , 03/17/2009
Sign up for this newsletter now!

Mich Kabay takes a high-level view of security issues and provides resources to help safeguard your corporate and personal security.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

The Kraken (a 19th century word referring to a giant squid) is a huge network of personal computers that have been infected with software that turns them into zombie systems under the control of a master program - a botnet. The Kraken botnet is used by criminals to generate spam.

Kelly Jackson Higgins, writing for DarkReading, says, “like Storm, Kraken so far is mostly being used for spamming the usual scams – high interest loans, gambling, male enhancement products, pharmacy advertisements, and counterfeit watches, for instance.” The botnet is the largest known; in April 2008 it was estimated to have included 400,000 zombies. 

Gregg Keizer of Computerworld reports that in April 2008, TippingPoint researchers Pedram Amini and Cody Pierce "created a fake Kraken command-and-control server by reverse engineering the list of domain names found in a captured sample of the bot, and then registered some of the sub-domains Kraken looks for. The server essentially acted as a command-and-control honeypot that waited for connections from PCs infected with the bot."

As a result, the scientists “monitored the incoming communications from Kraken bots for seven days.” They “listened and collected statistics for a week, and filtered out [for] the IP addresses and then the systems.” Then “Pierce wrote code that would let him redirect infected PCs, or better yet, use the bot’s built-in update mechanism – something most malware includes – to remove Kraken.”

However, management at TippingPoint forbade the researchers from activating the cleaning code. They argued that although it might be nice to interfere with the botnet, the law in the U.S. forbids unauthorized access to anyone’s computers, including zombies. In addition, managers were concerned about the possibility that their code could inadvertently damage the systems of unknowing recipients of their well-intentioned cleaning. 

This case illustrates sound judgment on the part of the managers at TippingPoint. There are two fundamental problems here:

1. Releasing programs that modify other people’s systems without permission, even with the best of intentions, is a prescription for disaster. It’s bad enough getting a poorly tested patch from a major software vendor that screws up the operating system or an application program when we allow it to load; having someone’s bright idea invade our computers without permission – and inevitably, without consideration of particular configurations that will make the program cause damage – is unconscionable.

M. E. Kabay, PhD, CISSP-ISSMP, specializes in security and operations management consulting services. CV online.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print
Comments (10)
Login
Forgot your account info?

Kraken vigilantiesBy Anonymous on March 17, 2009, 9:59 amI'm not a lawyer, but I can't see how you could be liable if someone (or their zombie computer) came to a website you control, downloaded, then ran cleaning code...

Reply | Read entire comment

Where are the authoritiesBy Anonymous on March 17, 2009, 10:57 amInteresting. On one hand, I agree with the first poster in justifying some means to clean these computers of the botnet software (if that is even possible without...

Reply | Read entire comment

KrakenBy Zowie on March 17, 2009, 11:47 amAll this caution sounds very good. If you change that from PC's to people then this becomes watching a disaster occur because your afraid to do something good for...

Reply | Read entire comment

Tell them!By Anonymous on March 17, 2009, 12:01 pmAssuming it's true that a user's computer is infected, and since you have "control" of his computer, is it possible to make him aware that he is infected, and that...

Reply | Read entire comment

Ethics?By Anonymous on March 17, 2009, 1:53 pmFrom the article, even though the botnet has been clearly identified, it would appear that nothing has been done to stop it as a result of this research. What are...

Reply | Read entire comment

Work with ISPs and blocklists, not vigilantesBy Bill Stewart on March 17, 2009, 2:03 pmIt's frustrating that you can't just trash the zombie machines, but you really can't, because as the article says, there are some machines that you're going to cause...

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed