Today, more reader input, this time on my newsletter regarding multi-core systems. Several readers wrote to tell me that, yes, the move to multi-core platforms obviously is inevitable, but there remain several wrinkles. Those include issues about reliability, security and I/O throughput with more workloads being put onto single boxes.

Al Muller, a principal architect at AT&T Consulting and the author of a pair of books on virtualization, says that multi-core technology will be the foundation for consolidating proliferating hardware into a more energy- and cost-efficient virtualized environment.

“As more processing power becomes available in 1U, 2U and 4U form factors, the ability to maximize consolidation ratios onto these traditional servers will dramatically increase,” he says.

He notes that he just completed a virtualization design for an international publishing company and by using dual-core AMD processors, reduced their hardware needs by 25%. “Had true multi-core processors been available, the ratio could have been driven even higher, increasing efficiency, decreasing power and cooling requirements and reducing hardware and data center space costs.”

Along with advances in the server processor, however, there needs to be other hardware improvements in order to gain the greatest benefit out of the multi-core systems, Muller says.

“Other hardware advances are important, such as higher RAM concentrations per server, faster network connectivity, dual- and quad-port NICs and faster access to storage such as 4GB HBAs,” he says.

Another reader says he also is looking at multi-core systems, but taking things slowly.

“For non-mission critical work it's a no-brainer ….move it to multi-core systems,” says Bob Williams. “For complex systems that are mission critical, co-hosting them on the same physical unit is being approached with a great deal of caution.”

He adds: “What disturbs me most is that we are now starting to see the real need to solve mainframe like problems on small/mid-sized systems doing mainframe work. It is, frankly, scary. For example, mainframe system OSes and [mission critical] applications have a feature called checkpoint re-start. Co-hosting a number of [mission critical] applications without this capability [or something similar] is playing roulette with a guaranteed outcome. You are going to get nailed.”

Whitepapers

• The Trend from UNIX to Linux in SAP(r) Data Centers
• Secure Wireless Printing Options
• Improve Virtual Storage TCO by Comparing Vendors
• Making IT Invisible
• Best Practices for VMware ESX Server
• Virtualizing Storage for VMware Success

View more DATA CENTER whitepapers

Webcasts

• Branch Office Trends and Best Practices
• Data Protection and Application Availability for Your VMware Environment with Veritas NetBackup and Cluster Server for VMware ESX
• Making NetBackup Highly Available with Storage Foundation HA
• Best Practices for Deploying WAN Optimization for Disaster Recovery
• Tips and Techniques for Remote Data Backup and Delivery
• WAN Optimization Landscape

View more DATA CENTER webcasts

Special Reports

• Executive Guide: Storage Heats Up
• Symantec State of the Data Center Report
• Data Centers: At the center of the action
• Executive Guide: Virtualization Reality Check
• Executive Guide: Data Center Decisions
• Get More From Your WAN

View more DATA CENTER special reports