How National Association of Home Builders moved beyond VMware, Part 2
SWsoft as an alternative to VMware
By
Jennifer Mears
,
Network World
, 06/28/2007
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
What follows is the continuation of the edited transcript of my talk with John Yanekian, director of network services at the
National Association of Home Builders in Washington, D.C. The NAHB has been running SWsoft in production for the past year
and a half. In this part, Yanekian talks more about the features and advantages of Virtuozzo, SWsoft’s x86 server virtualization
software.
Mears: What kinds of benefits are you seeing from using Virtuozzo?
Yanekian: We’ve consolidated 16 servers onto two production boxes. So we don’t have 16 individual servers we’d have to maintain
and patch. That’s a good thing about Virtuozzo: since it virtualizes above the operating system, when you patch the host server,
all your virtual servers are patched. I don’t have to go one-by-one and patch them.
Mears: What other features do you use?
Yanekian: One of the things that amazes me with Virtuozzo is if you’re running a virtual server and you run out of disk space
you can go to the management console and say, ‘Give it another 20 gigs.’ And before you reach the terminal server and refresh
it, that 20 gigs is allocated to your OS partition and you have more room. You’re never going to run out of disk space. You
can do the same with memory and CPUs, adding more memory or CPUs on the fly. Another good thing is you can back up one virtual
server to another virtual server. You can cross back up, so if your virtual server dies or the host server dies for some reason,
you can restore the backups on the surviving host until you fix the hardware.
Mears: With Virtuozzo, you don’t need a SAN to move virtual servers, right?
Yanekian: Right, Virtuozzo moves the data file, the hard drive file, to the other server and brings it up. Every server is
allocated a folder with an ID and all your registry, all your files, all your data are in that private area. When you move
the virtual server from one node to another, Virtuozzo moves that folder from one node to another and brings it right up.
Mears: What kinds of savings are you seeing with Virtuozzo?
Yanekian: We have 16 servers consolidated in virtual servers and I figure that average server costs between $6,000 and $8,000,
so we saved that. We saved on network ports, power, KVM ports, rack space, cooling and heating. I’d say we save about $10,000
per server per year. And I don’t have to have the maintenance for the hardware. So I don’t have to buy the hardware and I
don’t have to worry about patching it because I patched the host and everything is patched. Plus the OS license, which is
another $800 dollars for standard and $3,000 for enterprise.
Partner Content
www.bmc.com
Gartner 2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling
Gartner has positioned BMC CONTROL-M in the Leaders Quadrant of their "2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling." The report assesses the ability to execute and completeness of vision of key vendors in the marketplace. Read a full copy today, courtesy of BMC Software.
Download whitepaper
Dell's SMART Approach to Workload Automation
Read a compelling case study by EMA, Inc. to learn how Dell uses BMC CONTROL-M to cut cost and increase productivity with workload automation.
Download whitepaper
Workload Automation Cost Savings 2 Minute Video
A major computer manufacturer uses BMC CONTROL-M and just four people to schedule and run over 85,000 jobs every month. By switching to BMC CONTROL-M, they more than quadrupled the workload without adding a single staff member. See how in this 2-minute video overview.
Go to video
Comments (2)
Virtualization optionsBy Anonymous on June 28, 2007, 8:55 amOther than the patching comments and the cost for VMWare licenses, I fail to see what Virtuozzo provides that VMWare does not. The equation changes significantly...
Reply | Read entire comment
Virtuozzo will give you atBy Respons to Anonymous on June 28, 2007, 5:53 pmVirtuozzo will give you at least double the density of virtuals (half the hardware!) or better, has zero disc i/o overhead, can allocate cpu, disc & memory on the...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments