Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

(Comma separation for multiple addresses)
Your Message:

Owen Bird law firm flies from VMware, Part 2

Why Owen Bird chose Virtual Iron over VMware
By Jennifer Mears , Network World , 07/26/2007
Jennifer Mears
  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

What follows is the conclusion of my talk with Stephen Bakerman, IT manager at Owen Bird, a law firm in Vancouver, British Columbia. In this newsletter, Bakerman talks in more specifics about Virtual Iron and why the law firm is using Virtual Iron’s technology to reach its virtualization goals. Read Part 1 of the interview here.

Jennifer Mears: You’ve had Virtual Iron now for about a month. Are you running it in production?

Stephen Bakerman: Yes, we’re running in both test and production. We only have a single physical server running Virtual Iron at this point, but we’re running our BlackBerry server on there in full production. We’re going to be rebuilding our terminal server configuration and we’re going to be building that on that unit. We also keep a test environment for our accounting package running, which is a SQL server and another terminal server, which will be running on there 24/7.

Mears: Are all of these applications Windows applications? Virtual Iron’s support for Windows is relatively new, isn’t it?

Bakerman: Yes, today all the applications are Windows. We haven’t had any problems. It’s rock solid.

Mears: What features are the most important to you in Virtual Iron?

Bakerman: Outside of their support and their cost, they have a feature set that is similar in my opinion to VMware. We’ve got their live migration, which if a server goes down it will restart automatically on the next available physical server. If a physical server becomes overloaded with CPU utilization or memory utilization, I like the fact that I can create policies to move those virtual servers across from one physical machine to another without having to shut them down, restart them or without even having to get involved to monitor them on an ongoing basis. The other thing is the virtualization manager being able to integrate into our SAN. We bought an entry level SAN, an Excel Meridian SAN. VMware wouldn’t support it at all. Excel Meridian said they would work with Virtual Iron and Virtual Iron was willing to work with them. Now we have our Excel Meridian SAN working in production with Virtual Iron.

Mears: Were there any concerns from the shareholders about Virtual Iron since it was the new kid, while VMware has proven itself?

Bakerman: There were. But I had the promise from Virtual Iron that it would work and I believed them. They stood behind it. Every time I had a technical question I was put in contact with an engineer.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print
Partner Content

Gartner 2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling

Gartner has positioned BMC CONTROL-M in the Leaders Quadrant of their "2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling." The report assesses the ability to execute and completeness of vision of key vendors in the marketplace. Read a full copy today, courtesy of BMC Software.

Download whitepaper

Dell's SMART Approach to Workload Automation

Read a compelling case study by EMA, Inc. to learn how Dell uses BMC CONTROL-M to cut cost and increase productivity with workload automation.

Download whitepaper

Workload Automation Cost Savings 2 Minute Video

A major computer manufacturer uses BMC CONTROL-M and just four people to schedule and run over 85,000 jobs every month. By switching to BMC CONTROL-M, they more than quadrupled the workload without adding a single staff member.  See how in this 2-minute video overview.

Go to video

Comment
Login
Forgot your account info?
Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed