Study proves e-discovery confusion

Most companies are not prepared to tackle the mandates of document retention and retrieval

Developments of the week in storage

A survey from Kelton Research commissioned by Xerox Litigation Services pointed out that while most companies have faith in their e-discovery abilities, they are not prepared to tackle the mandates of document retention and retrieval.

Of the 200 legal professionals surveyed, only 29% said they were ‘extremely prepared’ to handle e-discovery requests.

Among 81% of the respondents, who review documents for litigation purposes, the study found that in-house e-discovery review systems provide slow turnaround, inadequate support, lack of important features and inadequate IT department support.

Forty two percent of the respondents blamed slow turnaround for their problems, 41% cited inadequate system support. Another 41% said that in-house software lacked important features such as search options. And, 38% blamed IT for its inability to support the in-house document review system.

To continue reading, register here and become an Insider. You'll get free access to premium content from CIO, Computerworld, CSO, InfoWorld, and Network World. See more Insider content or sign in.

A survey from Kelton Research commissioned by Xerox Litigation Services pointed out that while most companies have faith in their e-discovery abilities, they are not prepared to tackle the mandates of document retention and retrieval.

Of the 200 legal professionals surveyed, only 29% said they were ‘extremely prepared’ to handle e-discovery requests.

Among 81% of the respondents, who review documents for litigation purposes, the study found that in-house e-discovery review systems provide slow turnaround, inadequate support, lack of important features and inadequate IT department support.

Forty two percent of the respondents blamed slow turnaround for their problems, 41% cited inadequate system support. Another 41% said that in-house software lacked important features such as search options. And, 38% blamed IT for its inability to support the in-house document review system.

As you would expect from a company that provides litigation services, over 1/3 of the legal professionals said the benefits of outsourcing e-discovery work are cost-effectiveness and decreased time processing documents.

As a result of the survey, Xerox recommends that legal professionals get together a litigation game plan. This plan would equip them with policies and procedures so they can more readily respond to litigation. Legal professionals may not always want to rely on in-house software and appliances for their e-discovery needs, but should consider either outsourcing those requirements or supplementing their in-house systems. Companies should also seek external advice – of course, this would be with Xerox Litigation Services.

You might ask, why is Xerox interested in e-discovery? In 2006, the company acquired Amici, an e-discovery service provider. Xerox Litigation Services, which grew out of this acquisition, provides in-house counsel and outside law firms with enterprise-wide discovery management processes and services.

Read more about data center in Network World's Data Center section.

Deni Connor is principal analyst for Storage Strategies NOW and host of both the Masters of Storage and Masters of Servers Solution Centers.