- Is the Cisco MARS mission going to abort?
- First iPhone worm spreads Rick Astley wallpaper
- 10 stunning 3D buildings made with Google SketchUp
- Open source software ready for big business
- Four reasons to buy (and one reason to avoid) the Droid
Linda Musthaler's CIO-level look at the latest networking technologies and their benefits and pitfalls.
There's nothing quite like stirring the pot of controversy. Last month, my Cache Advance column addressed the issue of cheating on certification exams. Specifically, I said that using "study aids" (i.e., stolen exams) that come from braindump Web sites could put a certification candidate at risk of being accused of cheating. The column was intended to inform people that many certifying agencies are now using data forensics to analyze test responses and look for extremely unusual behavior. As it turns out, people who use braindump materials often fall into this category. The ultimate penalty for cheating could be loss of certification with negative employment consequences.
This assertion led to a reader backlash, with some people suggesting that the forensic analysis is inaccurate and would ensnare
people who did not cheat in any way, shape or form. Anonymous readers posted comments such as these:
* “…who validates the forensics (since this will destroy somones [sic] career for life)? In any investigation, there are always
false positives. Legitimate people (even if only a few) will be caught unfairly. How will this be policed?”
* “We're supposed to believe that these tests are flawless? How are they going to handle it when they inevitably accuse an
innocent person? The same way corporations always handle it, of course. Deny everything. Smear the person in the press. Throw
lots of lawyers at them until they can't afford to go on. This sounds like another witch hunt.”
* “Has anyone else seen or heard of this? Is the Microsoft cheating, a rediculous [sic] red herring? Or is there some kind
of official [sic] document saying if you get all the answers right you'll be banned?”
Clearly I need to provide more details around my assertions on certification cheating, and especially the use of data forensics to uncover possible cheaters. (Oh, and for the person who suggested I must be on Microsoft’s payroll, let me assure you that I am not and never have been.)
My sources for my information are the best they can be—people who work for the certifying agencies, the test centers and the data forensics company. (By “certifying agency,” I mean any company or organization that issues a certification based on a candidate meeting specified requirements. Examples would be Microsoft, Cisco, CompTIA, Linux Professional Institute, etc.) These organizations all have a vested interest in seeing that the certification process is legitimate and fair to everyone, and that any cheating that exists in the process is eliminated.
Linda Musthaler is a principal analyst with Essential Solutions Corporation.
Diagnosing why an application is slow is hard, at times taking days or weeks to isolate and resolve. This paper explains the challenges involved using current management tools, provides a 'wish list' for application management and analysis, and explains the need for an application system-wide approach that monitors entire applications, not components.
This paper highlights the impact of virtualization on application performance. "Managing Application Performance in Virtual Environments" states: "Best-in-Class organizations are predominately taking actions around improving visibility across both physical and virtual systems, assessing the business impact of application performance and understanding interdependencies of applications in virtualized environments."
Forrester Research analyst Glenn O'Donnell and BlueStripe co-founder Vic Nyman discuss a breakthrough approach to application problem management. Learn the new approach for ITSM problem management, which provides: Rapid isolation of application slow-downs to specific components for quick problem resolution, 24/7 monitoring for proactive notification of potential issues before end users are impacted and much more.
Partner Content
Blue Stripe Software
www.bluestripe.com/
Improving Application Performance Troubleshooting
Diagnosing why an application is slow is hard, at times taking days or weeks to isolate and resolve. This paper explains the challenges involved using current management tools, provides a 'wish list' for application management and analysis, and explains the need for an application system-wide approach that monitors entire applications, not components.
Download Whitepaper
Virtual Vigilance: Managing Application Performance in Virtual Environments
This paper highlights the impact of virtualization on application performance. "Managing Application Performance in Virtual Environments" states: "Best-in-Class organizations are predominately taking actions around improving visibility across both physical and virtual systems, assessing the business impact of application performance and understanding interdependencies of applications in virtualized environments."
Download Whitepaper
Application Service Requests: The Missing Link for Pragmatic ITSM
Forrester Research analyst Glenn O'Donnell and BlueStripe co-founder Vic Nyman discuss a breakthrough approach to application problem management. Learn the new approach for ITSM problem management, which provides: Rapid isolation of application slow-downs to specific components for quick problem resolution, 24/7 monitoring for proactive notification of potential issues before end users are impacted and much more.
Register for Webcast
Comments (1)
"Maynes could not give a definitive statement about the accuracy of Caveon’s statistical models...By Anonymous on September 29, 2008, 10:16 am"Maynes could not give a definitive statement about the accuracy of Caveon’s statistical models." - This is a very interesting proposition ... using an assessment...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments