Skip Links

Microblogging with improvement needed

Plurk will need to improve to become a significant player in the microblogging world

Web Applications Alert By Mark Gibbs, Network World
June 04, 2008 12:04 AM ET
Gibbs
Sign up for this newsletter now!

Mark Gibbs' Web site tips, plus network applications news headlines

  • Print

Over the last few weeks Twitter's scalability problems have been much discussed. Ranging from service downtime, through significant delays in handling message traffic ("tweets"), to features being disabled for hours at a time Twitter has gone from microblogging category owner to potential also-ran.

This is the downside of unexpected success with Web applications – your service will get pounded and every error condition found over and over again. When that happens you will only have a matter of hours or at best a couple of days to fix problems, and when you don’t public sentiment - being the fickle thing that it is - will turn against and away from you.

So it is that Twitter users are now looking and talking about alternatives, and other microblogging players are trying to get their attention.

In Gearhead last week I mentioned Friendfeed, “which aims to aggregate your social networking and blog accounts so you have, in theory, one point of contact with your social network as well as one point to make comments on content and share it using services like Digg and del.icio.us. Some commentators claim it is the heir to the Twitter throne but, while I like the service, I have yet to be completely convinced.”

Another service that has attracted some attention recently is Plurk, which is similar to Twitter in that it routes small messages (like Twitter they are limited to 140 characters), and similar to Friendfeed in that it attempts to integrate with other networking services (instant messaging, Webmail, social networking) to find your “friends.”

One of the long-term complaints about Twitter has been its user interface which, while not truly awful, is definitely very old-school. Plurk attempts to improve on this with more sophisticated user interface techniques, but (and this may be just my opinion) wraps them up in weird colors and what I can only assume are “in jokes” (the service’s logo is what looks like a ham hock with a bone sticking out of it, on legs, and with a wagging tail).

Rather than showing messages (“plurks”) from users and their friends in a simple vertical list like Twitter, Plurk shows messages as threaded conversations in a horizontal timeline. Moreover this view can be filtered to show a just the user’s messages or both the user’s and their friends’ messages.

Going back to Plurk’s eccentricities, the service awards you a “Karma” score, which is based on the activity of you and your friends. The only “reward” for this appears to be being able to use “exclusive” emoticons in your plurks and getting a different icon than the ham on legs graphic. I must be missing something here because this whole concept seems utterly pointless.

Be that as it may, Plurk has a long way to go if it wants to get the attention of microbloggers. Before I registered I explored the site and “About Plurk” returned “The server has either erred or is incapable of performing the requested operation” error.

When I registered one of the first things Plurk offered to do was check my instant messaging account to find my friends. This didn’t work either. Once I had completed registration I went back and tried to add friends by letting Plurk log in to my Gmail account. That also didn’t work and I got “The server has either erred or is incapable of performing the requested operation” again.

Mark Gibbs is a consultant, author, journalist, columnist and blogger.

  • Print

Videos

rssRss Feed