Search /
Docfinder:
Advanced search  |  Help  |  Site map
RESEARCH CENTERS
SITE RESOURCES
Click for Layer 8! No, really, click NOW!
Networking for Small Business
TODAY'S NEWS
Wireless/Mobile /

Comparing spread spectrum technologies

Related linksToday's breaking news
Send to a friendFeedback

Sign up to receive this and other networking newsletters in your inbox.

Because I receive a fair amount of e-mails questioning the difference between direct sequence spread spectrum and frequency hopping spread spectrum, I thought I'd take a moment to address the basics of these radio transmission methods.

First, let's take a high-level look at spread spectrum technology. Spread spectrum technology is a radio transmission technology that embeds mechanisms to avoid interference - both from other wireless devices and intruders.

The HomeRF wireless LAN specification uses frequency hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) for radio transmission, while the 802.11b standards use direct sequence spread spectrum (DSSS). Although the two LANs use the same frequency band (2.4 GHz, unlicensed), they are not interoperable. The Bluetooth personal area network, which is currently heating up for wireless communications among peripheral devices, also runs in the 2.4 GHz band and specifies the use of FHSS.

Spread spectrum in general was originally the brainchild of the military, invented to prevent radio signals from being monitored or blocked by nefarious souls. For wireless communications in an unlicensed radio frequency band, FCC regulations require the use of a spread spectrum technology. The choice is DSSS or FHSS.

FHSS was invented first. It changes the frequency of a transmission at regular intervals faster than an intruder could retune a jamming device designed to block a transmission running on a particular frequency. For FHSS to be used successfully, the receiver must know the frequency-hopping pattern so that it can interpret the transmission.

DSSS came along later. Unlike frequency hopping, DSSS spreads chunks of data over multiple frequencies at the same time. DSSS is said to provide somewhat faster data transmission and shorter delays because the transmitters and receivers don't have to spend time retuning to different frequencies. On the other hand, FHSS is said to consume less power and allow more access points than DSSS to coexist in the same area without blocking one another from transmitting.

RELATED LINKS

Joanie Wexler is an independent networking technology writer/editor in Campbell, Calif., who has spent most of her career analyzing trends and news in the computer networking industry. She welcomes your comments on the articles published in this newsletter, as well as your ideas for future article topics. Reach her at joanie@jwexler.com.

Network World Wireless archive
Past newsletters.

DSSS and FHSS backgrounder

Satellite Internet: Wireless medium looks for a niche
Network World, 06/25/01

Compaq bolsters handhelds
Network World, 06/25/01

Wireless advances to be on display at PC Expo
Network World, 06/25/01


NWFusion offers more than 40 FREE technology-specific email newsletters in key network technology areas such as NSM, VPNs, Convergence, Security and more.
Click here to sign up!
New Event - WANs: Optimizing Your Network Now.
Hear from the experts about the innovations that are already starting to shake up the WAN world. Free Network World Technology Tour and Expo in Dallas, San Francisco, Washington DC, and New York.
Attend FREE
Your FREE Network World subscription will also include breaking news and information on wireless, storage, infrastructure, carriers and SPs, enterprise applications, videoconferencing, plus product reviews, technology insiders, management surveys and technology updates - GET IT NOW.
* HOME    * RESEARCH CENTERS     * NEWS     * EVENTS

Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy | How to Advertise
Reprints and links | Partnerships | Subscribe to NW
About Network World, Inc.

Copyright, 1994-2006 Network World, Inc. All rights reserved.