Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

(Comma separation for multiple addresses)
Your Message:

Should you worry about the interference effects of "Super G"?

Tests indicate 108M bit/sec products can degrade 802.11g performance
Wireless Alert By Joanie Wexler , Network World , 01/21/2004
Sign up for this newsletter now!

Joanie Wexler looks at how enterprises can take advantage of wireless LANs and WANs.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

OK, you've read the headline. So let's get the caveats out of the way first.

Any network environment is going to have lots of variables so absolutes in networking decisions are few and far between. Most of what you read has to be considered in the context of your own environment and your own beliefs about the "right" way to do networking. Particularly when it comes to wireless networking, you're well advised to do some of your own benchmarking before making big decisions. What works well under a certain set of circumstance may not match your own.

This having been said, the wireless network environment has aspects to it that you don't even have to consider in the wired world. One is that radio-frequency signals don't stop and start at strictly defined points, as traffic traversing a cable attached to two ports does. Another is that radio signals radiate in three dimensions, not just back and forth on a cable. These traits mean that wireless networks can unexpectedly affect the workings of other wireless products - whether they are yours or someone else's.

This is one concern that has come up surrounding products based on Atheros' so-called "Super G" chip, a derivative of the 54M bit/sec 802.11g standard that "bonds" channel 6, half of channel 1 and half of channel 11 together to give you higher theoretical throughput (108M bit/sec).

The Tolly Group has tested the effects of Super G products on nearby 802.11g standard-compliant products as well as in networks with multiple Super G products only. The impact of the degradation in these tests is significant and worth noting.

Note that most of Atheros' Super G products are currently supported in consumer-class products. One reason is that consumers are very interested in downloading multimedia entertainment - and the higher speeds boost that ability.

But Super G is not an industry standard. If you don't want to use standards and not doing so affects only you, so be it. On the other hand, since wireless can affect your neighbors - whether in a house, apartment, condo or office suite next door - is installing it the right thing to do?

The Tolly Group plans to release a formal report later this month. It was commissioned to run the Super G tests by cutthroat Atheros competitor Broadcom (which admits having some skin in the game here). So there is an agenda afoot other than the good of the industry. But that doesn't mean that you shouldn't be informed about this issue, which has some teeth.

Joanie Wexler is an independent networking technology writer/editor in Silicon Valley.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print
Comment
Login
Forgot your account info?
Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed