- Insider threat looms large in San Francisco
- Woman fired over death threat
- IT admin pleads not guilty
- Tape storage gets more dense
- Top 10 worst uses for Windows
News | Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS
Cisco presented a case in the last newsletter for implementing pre-standard 802.11n networks today. This time, Joanne Lennon from Nortel's WLAN marketing group points out some of the benefits of waiting for standards and product/technology maturity. Writes Joanne:
There’s no trivializing 802.11n’s inevitable impact on the marketplace. It affords significant enough bandwidth and range to be a key enabler of the future “unwired enterprise.” But, is 2008 the time for deployment? Nortel urges waiting. Here’s why:
* Ratification of 802.11n isn’t expected until mid-2009, giving many enterprises reason to pause. A 2007 Nortel/Kubernan survey
found only 16% of respondents willing to deploy pre-standard products, and 15% of those were limited to controlled pilots.
* First-generation solutions hitting the market this year will have a maximum bandwidth of 150Mbps to 300Mbps. Full 802.11n
capabilities utilizing more than the two spatial streams supported in today’s draft-gen of silicon won’t be here until 2009
or 2010. Should draft-gen APs not meet requirements, enterprises might have to later upgrade from 802.11n to a “better” 802.11n.
* Current 802.11n radios can be more than double the cost of 802.11 a/b/g access points. While AP prices will drop as demand
increases, early adopters will initially pay a premium.
* Draft-n may necessitate reverting back to network interface cards, bringing added complexity and cost over currently embedded
802.11 clients.
* Maximum capacity and consistent coverage requires overlapping cells using 40MHz channel widths in 5GHz spectrum. Most consumer-oriented
clients support “draft-n” only in the 2.4GHz band.
In addition to the above, there are infrastructure concerns. If the throughput benefits of 802.11n are to be realized, the WLAN architecture must be able to support higher traffic volumes. Edge switching capacity and switching power also need to withstand increasing requirements. Without GigE, APs generating around 100Mbps will be artificially constrained. And, today’s 802.3af PoE can’t supply enough juice for maximum data rates with MIMO. The better fit will be with the coming 802.3at [IEEE PoE Plus standard].
To be sure, 802.11n will be transformational at the right time, but there should be compelling reasons to adopt early, as much greater capabilities are around the corner. In the interim, enterprises need to consider how mobility and wireless access can transform their business, identify the high-value applications they want to support and build a plan spanning clients, network and applications to ensure successful implementation. Most enterprises, however, would be best served by waiting until the standard is ratified and the full ecosystem is in place prior to adoption.
All you guys are fighting about is the fact you can reset the routers. This was childs point. He created...- Daniel
Comments (2)
comment by DBBy Tiger on January 23, 2008, 4:02 pmSounds like a "shoot from the lip" comment. Personal, current experience with an 802.11n DRAFTv2 pilot confirms all the points made by Joanne Lennon. The sceanario:...
Reply | Read entire comment
RE: Should you deploy 802.11n in 2008? Part 2By DB on January 23, 2008, 9:38 amSounds like Nortel is trying to stall the market since they don't have a product to offer yet.
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments