- Mythbuster busts his own tale
- 10 open source companies to watch
- Sony recalls 73,000 Vaio laptops
- Tool to evade China's Web censorship
- Chrome and Firefox and add-ons
Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS
Joanie Wexler looks at how enterprises can take advantage of wireless LANs and WANs.
Jan. 31, 2008 may well be a day that lives in infamy for changing the mobile WAN forever. That's the day that a 700MHz spectrum auction bidder metaphorically scratched his head or tugged his ear upon hearing the virtual request: "Do I hear $4.71 billion?"
With a nod, the anonymous bidder surpassed the FCC’s minimum price of $4.64 billion required to ensure that open access services will come to fruition in part of the nationwide commercial “C-Block” spectrum that the U.S. government is currently auctioning off. The bid assured that businesses and consumers alike will eventually gain network service options that support any competitor's device or application.
What do these open access rules, now assured of materializing, actually specify?
Attorney Kevin DiLallo spelled them out during the Mobile Explosion conference in Las Vegas late last month. DiLallo, who
described today’s carrier approach of restricting network access for protecting network integrity as “hooey,” is a partner
at Levine, Blaszak, Block & Boothby, a Washington, D.C., law firm. Here’s how DiLallo summed up the open access rules for
C-block carrier license winners:
* Carriers can’t lock handsets to prevent their use on other networks. (But, of course, handsets and networks must be using
the same underlying technology to work together.)
* Carriers can’t block Wi-Fi access, MP3 playback ringtones, or other services that compete with the carrier’s own offerings. And they can’t charge customers extra for using competing devices or applications.
* Carriers can’t have more stringent standards for third-party equipment and applications than their own.
* Carriers aren’t allowed to exclude devices or applications because of bandwidth demands, though they are allowed to address the capacity issue in their pricing plans.
Bear in mind that devices used with open services will become more expensive, as operators likely won’t subsidize them and lengthy service contracts will taper off. This tradeoff is appealing to many large enterprises that want to mix and match devices across networks running like technology and want access to any new features and applications that the device might offer.
But note, too, that enterprises and consumers - who often put device price and simplicity above all - will still be able to purchase existing device/minutes plan packages just as they always have for the foreseeable future. (Learn more about Wireless products from our Wireless Buyer's Guide)
Joanie Wexler is an independent networking technology writer/editor in Silicon Valley.

Discover the capabilities your file integrity monitoring solution should have to effectively secure...
Realizing the Potential of User-Generated and Social NetworkingCan communication service providers (CSPs) leverage Web 2.0 services and create new service...
Digital Asset Management StrategyThe reality of Dramatically changing media landscape, has created awareness within the media and...

The standard for Power over Ethernet (PoE), IEEE Std. 802.3af(tm)-2003, advanced networking,...
Intelligent Mobility: BlackBerry Technical Seminar 2008The virtual BlackBerry Technical Seminar keeps growing in popularity every year, and we want to...
Harnessing the power of communications to increase workplace performanceDue to the convergence of IT and telecommunications technologies, the business workplace has been...

WAN Ethernet services are reliable, cost-efficient offerings that are widely available and in a...
Comment