Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

Realtor shuns controller-based Wi-Fi systems, pre-11n

First Industrial opts for 'cooperative' WLAN architecture
Wireless Alert By Joanie Wexler , Network World , 02/25/2008
Sign up for this newsletter now!

Joanie Wexler looks at how enterprises can take advantage of wireless LANs and WANs.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Despite the deafening 802.11n buzz in highly mobile and bandwidth-intensive university and healthcare environments, not all organizations are ready to buy into the pre-standard technology. First Industrial Realty Trust, for example, is currently building a 50-site 802.11a/g network. And it is doing so with a controller-less architecture.

The nationwide diversified industrial real estate company is in the process of covering its Chicago headquarters and 40 worldwide branch offices with distributed access points (AP) from start-up Aerohive. The Aerohive gear uses a so-called “cooperative control” architecture that functions conceptually much like a mesh router network: APs use special control protocols to discover one another and exchange state and best-path information. However, AP provisioning, configuration and policy setting are centralized at a special management console.

First Industrial will deploy 802.11a, which operates in the 5GHz band, in high-density areas such as its Chicago offices where the 2.4GHz frequency is cluttered with “thousands of Wi-Fi radios,” says Nick Colakovic, director of IT. He says he would rather have deployed 802.11n, but the final standard, not expected until spring 2009, has taken too long to materialize.

“There will be no pre-standard N here. We don’t believe in interoperability testing” of pre-standard products, which the Wi-Fi Alliance is currently conducting. “And you can’t really run all the [11n] radios you want off a standard power-over-Ethernet environment” because the aggregate power requirements are too great, he says.

Colakovic searched for a controller-less approach to save the capital and operational expenses associated with buying and operating many WLAN controllers.

“We have quite a few locations,” Colakovic explains. “To deploy a controller costing five figures in each location is extremely expensive, and many have disks that must be maintained and can fail. We’d need a full-time staff person to maintain that infrastructure.”

Having the control functions embedded in intercommunicating Aerohive APs eliminates the need for wireless LAN controllers that have gained prominence over the past five years. Colakovic estimates a 48% savings in capital costs using the controller-less architecture, a number that “would be much higher if we figured in the soft costs,” he says.

Joanie Wexler is an independent networking technology writer/editor in Silicon Valley.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print
Comments (9)
Login
Forgot your account info?

It's all good! Network NeutralityBy Anonymous on February 29, 2008, 12:54 pmKeep it up Joanie. As Tiger Woods and Barack Obama say, "it is all good". You are giving a fair and balanced (FOX News -like coverage) to the WLAN industry. Some...

Reply | Read entire comment

The point of a case study isBy Joanie Wexler on February 27, 2008, 5:41 pmThe point of a case study is to provide a venue in which one enterprise shares ideas, strategies, thought processes and potential gotchas with their IT peers in...

Reply | Read entire comment

Hi Joanie - As someone thatBy Anonymous on February 27, 2008, 12:17 amHi Joanie - As someone that works for one of the two major wireless companies, the article's two title purposes (controller-less model and non-802.11n) aren't...

Reply | Read entire comment

Joanie, the model numbers IBy Anonymous on February 26, 2008, 4:51 pmJoanie, the model numbers I mentioned are for a complete mini-PCI radio card, not just the chip. Atheros DVT (design verification testing) reports for those designs...

Reply | Read entire comment

Dear Anonymous: The chipsetBy Joanie Wexler on February 26, 2008, 3:27 pmDear Anonymous: The chipset model numbers you mention are company-internal numbers. Externally/commercially, they are known as the AR5008 (launched in 2006)...

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed