- Microsoft Windows chief decries standards grandstanding
- The 5 best, and 5 worst, features of Google Chrome OS
- Federal government using PS3 to crack pedophile passwords
- 10G Ethernet cheat sheet
- Top 10 free Windows tools for IT pros, at a glance
Joanie Wexler looks at how enterprises can take advantage of wireless LANs and WANs.
Despite the deafening 802.11n buzz in highly mobile and bandwidth-intensive university and healthcare environments, not all organizations are ready to buy into the pre-standard technology. First Industrial Realty Trust, for example, is currently building a 50-site 802.11a/g network. And it is doing so with a controller-less architecture.
The nationwide diversified industrial real estate company is in the process of covering its Chicago headquarters and 40 worldwide branch offices with distributed access points (AP) from start-up Aerohive. The Aerohive gear uses a so-called “cooperative control” architecture that functions conceptually much like a mesh router network: APs use special control protocols to discover one another and exchange state and best-path information. However, AP provisioning, configuration and policy setting are centralized at a special management console.
First Industrial will deploy 802.11a, which operates in the 5GHz band, in high-density areas such as its Chicago offices where the 2.4GHz frequency is cluttered with “thousands of Wi-Fi radios,” says Nick Colakovic, director of IT. He says he would rather have deployed 802.11n, but the final standard, not expected until spring 2009, has taken too long to materialize.
“There will be no pre-standard N here. We don’t believe in interoperability testing” of pre-standard products, which the Wi-Fi Alliance is currently conducting. “And you can’t really run all the [11n] radios you want off a standard power-over-Ethernet environment” because the aggregate power requirements are too great, he says.
Colakovic searched for a controller-less approach to save the capital and operational expenses associated with buying and operating many WLAN controllers.
“We have quite a few locations,” Colakovic explains. “To deploy a controller costing five figures in each location is extremely expensive, and many have disks that must be maintained and can fail. We’d need a full-time staff person to maintain that infrastructure.”
Having the control functions embedded in intercommunicating Aerohive APs eliminates the need for wireless LAN controllers that have gained prominence over the past five years. Colakovic estimates a 48% savings in capital costs using the controller-less architecture, a number that “would be much higher if we figured in the soft costs,” he says.
Joanie Wexler is an independent networking technology writer/editor in Silicon Valley.
Comments (9)
RE: Realtor shuns controller-based Wi-Fi systems, pre-11nBy Kit Johnston on February 25, 2008, 12:27 pmJoanie, Thank you very much for the last paragraph of this article pointing out that there are alternatives to placing controllers in every location. My company,...
Reply | Read entire comment
Joanie, Mr. Colakovic isBy Anonymous on February 25, 2008, 3:26 pmJoanie, Mr. Colakovic is also off the mark on the PoE requirements. Siemens has announced a dual-radio, 3x3 MIMO access point that requires no more than 802.3af...
Reply | Read entire comment
In Reponse to: First Industrial's Design DecisionBy Joanie Wexler on February 25, 2008, 4:38 pmDear Readers: Before you are too hard on Mr. Colakovic at First Industrial, consider a couple of things. First, he researched his solution with a number of WLAN...
Reply | Read entire comment
Joanie, pick up any copy ofBy Anonymous on February 26, 2008, 12:24 amJoanie, pick up any copy of the Atheros MB81 and MB82 data sheets and you'll see the required power is nowhere near 10 watts.
Reply | Read entire comment
Dear Anonymous: The chipsetBy Joanie Wexler on February 26, 2008, 3:27 pmDear Anonymous: The chipset model numbers you mention are company-internal numbers. Externally/commercially, they are known as the AR5008 (launched in 2006)...
Reply | Read entire comment
Joanie, the model numbers IBy Anonymous on February 26, 2008, 4:51 pmJoanie, the model numbers I mentioned are for a complete mini-PCI radio card, not just the chip. Atheros DVT (design verification testing) reports for those designs...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments