Are terrestrial access services moribund?
Landlines battle wireless networks
Wireless Alert
By
Joanie Wexler
,
Network World
, 03/05/2008
Sign up for this newsletter now!
Joanie Wexler looks at how enterprises can take advantage of wireless LANs and WANs.
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
It began quietly last summer when T-Mobile launched its Hotspot@Home service. "It" is the current skirmish in which mobile operators are seeking to annihilate the landline business of their
competitors.
Last week, for example, Sprint followed rivals Verizon Wireless, AT&T and T-Mobile with a flat-rate voice plan costing about $100 per month. Sprint’s offering includes unlimited Web surfing, e-mail, text messaging, push-to-talk services
and GPS navigation - services you pay extra for with the other carriers.
The all-u-can-eat voice alternatives are not no-brainers for large businesses, as discussed in the last newsletter. But the per-user fee can also be on the hefty side for many consumers, who are already getting free nights, weekends and
mobile-to-mobile calling. (How much can you talk?)
Well, the moves likely represent the kickoff of a price-war-with-wiggle-room that doubles as a concerted effort to pull users
off landlines and onto wireless networks. Speculation abounded last summer, for example, that T-Mobile’s Hotspot@Home service
– which allows unlimited domestic voice calling over Wi-Fi integrated with fee-based GSM cellular service – was an attempt
to woo wired telephony and Internet access users to an all-wireless setup.
And I’ve heard it speculated that AT&T and Verizon might eventually offer free landline services as an accoutrement to their
wireless services, if for no other reasons than 1) doing so might circumvent their having to pay large settlement charges
to telcos in rural areas and 2) current and emerging generations of users will likely choose wireless and mobility over landlines,
rather than paying for both.
Now it will be difficult for businesses to get fiber-caliber services in the wireless access market. Still, some sites might
begin swapping in cellular – or forthcoming WiMAX services – as primary links in small locations or as a poor-man’s disaster
recovery service in others.
A telecom manager I know on the East Coast, for example, uses Sprint broadband (EV-DO Rev A) service in areas where DSL and
cable services are either nonexistent or exorbitantly priced. The company’s primary carrier is Verizon Wireless, but because
Verizon’s terms and conditions allow the carrier to limit data usage at will, this particular company uses Sprint — whose
plan is truly unlimited – for the cellular disaster recovery application, which delivers nearly a T-1’s worth of bandwidth
for under $100 per month.
Joanie Wexler is an independent networking technology writer/editor in Silicon Valley.
Comments (1)
I am all for MBB/Wireless Nets that Work Everywhere.By brecklundin on March 5, 2008, 2:29 pmnice food for thought!! Thanks. ;) One concern I have with wireless broadband services is the issue of tower saturation. Given that DSL is not a shared bandwidth...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments