Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

(Comma separation for multiple addresses)
Your Message:

Mandates might force in-building cellular projects

City ordinances require broadcast of public-safety wireless signals indoors
Wireless Alert By Joanie Wexler , Network World , 04/14/2008
Sign up for this newsletter now!

Joanie Wexler looks at how enterprises can take advantage of wireless LANs and WANs.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Even if you opt for Wi-Fi indoors and cellular outdoors for user communications - perhaps using some flavor of fixed-mobile convergence product or service - there still might be a distributed antenna system (DAS) in your future. Why? Because some city governments are starting to require that buildings figure out a way to boost public-safety radio signals indoors to protect and help first responders. And that probably means installing equipment that re-broadcasts signals in a variety of spectra.

I have in front of me, for example, ordinances from the City of Burbank and the City of Irvine in California requiring buildings to have radio amplification systems in the 400MHz range and 800MHz range, respectively, with associated minimum requirements for coverage, signal strength and reliability. If and when part of the D Block of the newly available 700MHz spectrum is purchased and applied to a nationwide public safety network, those signals will likely need to be supported, too.

In some cities, these requirements are for new buildings only. However, some mandates are retroactive, according to Aaron Nelson, co-founder of RepeatedSignal, a DAS supplier in Santa Barbara, Calif. He cites ordinances in Orange County, Las Vegas, New York and Chicago (starting in 2012) as other examples of local governments cracking down to ensure that police, firefighters and others have a way to communicate from inside buildings.

Depending on your geography and whether or not your company owns its building(s), these requirements may or may not impact you directly. Generally, the entity that owns and maintains the building is responsible for complying with the signal repeater ordinance. But if your company is that entity, you’re going to require an in-building amplifier and probably one that supports multiple signals types, given that public safety networks currently support varied spectra locally but will be moving to a common nationwide radio network in the future. Among the makers of DASs that support signal feeds from multiple sources are Andrew, ADC/LGC Wireless, InnerWireless and MobileAccess.

Whether it becomes your responsibility or your building owner’s to install a DAS, you might want to take the opportunity to capitalize on the system if it’s required to be there anyway. If you are in a multitenant building, you might explore with the building owner, for example, the possibility of supporting other signals you might need – say, from the cellular providers – with the various tenants chipping in something each month on the rent to help fund the system. Some folks are even interested in piggybacking their Wi-Fi signals onto the system, collocating their 802.11 access points in the telecom closet so that upgrades and changes don’t require climbing back into the ceiling. Again, these are possible considerations if the system is going to be there anyway.

Joanie Wexler is an independent networking technology writer/editor in Silicon Valley.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print
Comments (3)
Login
Forgot your account info?

indoor cellular repeatersBy Anonymous on August 28, 2008, 11:25 amThe carriers are questioning the legallity of users boosting frequencies licensed to the carriers. What is your assesment on the risk? Will our investment in this...

Reply | Read entire comment

Legality of Repeaters.By Anonymous on April 14, 2009, 3:23 pmMost every operator, but Sprint/Nextel will work with the end user to sign a spectrum lease agreement. Provided the equipment owner is using approved product and...

Reply | Read entire comment

Legality of RepeaterBy Azduck on May 1, 2009, 12:47 amAnon is partially correct with the exception of comments about Sprint Nextel. Sprint Nextel has the largest team and budget available to end users for the purposes...

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed