Where does Wi-Fi fit in a 4G world?
Techs contend to become the future mobile superhighway
Wireless Alert
By
Joanie Wexler
,
Network World
, 06/25/2008
Sign up for this newsletter now!
Joanie Wexler looks at how enterprises can take advantage of wireless LANs and WANs.
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
Several wireless technologies are contending to become the next-generation transport system for mobile video and collaborative
business applications and services. The frontrunners in the WAN are WiMAX and Long-Term Evolution (LTE).
Qualcomm’s Ultra Mobile Broadband (UMB) technology is a distant third, despite its aspirations to run at more than 200Mbps, more than twice the eventual intended
speeds of LTE and WiMAX (Compare WiMAX products). In a report late last year, ABI Research cited UMB’s lack of a robust partner ecosystem, which LTE and WiMAX have
both established, as one reason for describing UMB’s prospects as “dim.”
Both LTE and WiMAX make use of smart antenna capabilities and IP technology. And they both aspire to become available worldwide,
albeit at different paces. Ultimately, some dual-mode devices might support both LTE and WiMAX, with the user unaware of which
network is serving his or her data needs at a given moment.
At that juncture, what becomes of Wi-Fi? It could find mobile WAN technologies a threat, particularly if in-building femtocells,
picocells and other base stations catch on. This just might happen, too, if for no other reason than enterprises are likely
to be required to install in-building mobile WAN systems to comply with wireless public-safety mandates anyway.
Some vendors envision Wi-Fi in the access network and WiMAX/LTE in the backhaul portion of the network. Yet mobile WAN progress
is forging ahead in the access network, too: makers of multi-frequency distributed antenna systems, such as LGC Wireless and
MobileAccess, have added WiMAX modules to their systems. On the client side, Intel’s Montevina notebook platform, with optional
embedded dual-mode Wi-Fi and WiMAX connections, is due to ship this month.
It’s likely that all these wireless networks will prevail for some application or another. Even though it’s hard to imagine
ever needing still greater capacity - heck, even high-end telepresence systems from Cisco only require 15Mbps - getting more
bandwidth over short distances is always achievable first. So mobile LANs will likely always be around.
Joanie Wexler is an independent networking technology writer/editor in Silicon Valley.
Comments (4)
WIFI in a 4G WorldBy Anonymous on June 25, 2008, 9:10 amInteresting thought. I suspect there will be a need and want for indoor WLAN for quite some time, especially with the speeds 802.11g and n now offer. There is...
Reply | Read entire comment
... and Wi-Fi inherintly is interference-prone using ISM bands, By Anonymous on June 25, 2008, 9:28 am... and Wi-Fi inherintly is interference-prone using ISM bands, which _should_ not happen with LTE and WiMAX...
Reply | Read entire comment
Yes, but Wi-Fi is free andBy Anon on June 25, 2008, 12:40 pmYes, but Wi-Fi is free and unlicensed. No carrier to deal with, no walled gardens, etc. Wi-Fi is like tap water -- it's essentially free, but it might taste funny...
Reply | Read entire comment
802.11 going no where anytime soon.By Anonymous on June 25, 2008, 5:05 pmAlthough I am looking forward to the more mobile networks, i.e. WIMAX and LTE, I can't see wi-fi not being used. Even if these alternate technologies were to be...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments