The cost of scaling Wi-Fi capacity
Centralized backplane support could be big cost factor, depending on vendor
Wireless Alert
By
Joanie Wexler
,
Network World
, 06/30/2009
Sign up for this newsletter now!
Joanie Wexler looks at how enterprises can take advantage of wireless LANs and WANs.
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
Wireless LANs rarely allow for simple direct cost comparisons. In addition to variable pricing structures among vendors, one
reason is that product architectures differ. That means some systems have different components than others. So how can you
compare them, tit for tat?
To be honest, the situation isn't too bad so long as you are looking for basic data coverage across a given area with no per-user
throughput guarantees. What gets the mathematical grey matter really pumping is comparing prices when designing for capacity
and minimum per-user throughput. You might do this, for example, if you have begun regularly running a multimedia environment
with streaming media and want each user to have a certain level of experience at any time or for there always to be capacity
available for voice.
The design of a WLAN system dictates the number of network elements (and corresponding software licenses) required to achieve
desired coverage and capacity levels. So some systems simply require more infrastructure than others.
Fortunately, a number of Wi-Fi vendors make figuring out the AP part of the equation pretty easy with automated site survey
tools. You literally circle an area on an online floor plan, tell the system the minimum capacity you want there and -- voila!
-- the system tells you how many APs you need and where to install them. Multiply the number of APs by the per-AP cost and
you know the cost of that part of the environment (not including discounts, the negotiation of which is a whole other discussion).
However, some suppliers require WLAN controllers while others don't. Most relevant, some controller-based vendors require
all data traffic to be backhauled to the controller for forwarding. In this case, and because controller backplane bandwidth
can't be shared in non-clustered environments, you might have to add controllers to accumulate the aggregate, concurrent throughput
support you want.
Let's say you wanted each of 1,000 users to have 10Mbps of WLAN throughput available consistently, for example. That's 10,000Mbps,
or 10Gbps you'd need to support concurrently. Centralized 802.11n vendor controller backplane throughput ranges from 2G to
8Gbps, though some can be revved up using acceleration modules (for a cost).
But you can see that in such a centralized scenario, you might need anywhere from two to five controllers when designing for
capacity. And that means paying for all the associated licenses, bells and whistles, too.
Joanie Wexler is an independent networking technology writer/editor in Silicon Valley.
Comments (5)
The cost of scaling WiFi capacityBy dellalowe on July 1, 2009, 12:45 pmAs usual, Joanie, giving out useful advice and information. Just to let your readers know that AirTight does provide a free interactive WLAN coverage estimator which...
Reply | Read entire comment
Automated Site Survey Tools and..........disapointmentsBy Anonymous on July 2, 2009, 5:09 amFirst, I would call these tools Predictive Survey Tools for 2 reasons. First a site survey requires to be on site and to do real measurements with APs installed....
Reply | Read entire comment
How do I know if I'm out of capacity?By Anonymous on July 2, 2009, 7:35 amHow do I know if my network is out of capacity. Is the only way to count how many users call and complain? I do not have any relevant statistics available from my...
Reply | Read entire comment
Help is on the way...By kaaremi on July 2, 2009, 8:52 amFinding out what's relly going on in the WLAN environment can truly be a real pain. This concerns not just capacity, but also many other things related to Wireless...
Reply | Read entire comment
ToucheBy Joanie Wexler - NWW Wireless Alert on July 6, 2009, 7:50 pmThanks, JP, for pointing out the considerations of planning and building the WLAN in the first place. I agree that a better name for "automated site survey tools"...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments