Overall index performance
  Charting NW200 companies
  New and improved NW200 Stock Index


Search and DocFinder
 
Search help/advanced search

 


News NetFlash: Daily News Internat'l News This Week in NW The Edge Net.Worker Features Research Buyer's Guides Reviews Technology Primers Vendor Profiles Forums Columnists Knowledgebase Help Desk Dr. Intranet Gearhead Careers Free Newsletters Subscription Center Seminars/Events Reprints/Links White Papers Partner with Us Site Map Contact Us Awards Corporate info Home






 

Send to colleague



By Julie Bort

04/23/01

If numbers don't lie, then the story the Network World 200 Index tells is nothing short of depressing. From its opening at a namesake 200 points, the NW200 Index has had more downs than ups.

With the help of online investment education firm The Motley Fool, we created the NW200 Index a year ago by taking our list of the top 200 network companies, weighting each company based on revenue and deriving an average stock price, updated every 15 minutes. With the NW200 Index, we can ascertain the stock performance of the network industry. It's been disheartening.

In the last year, Wall Street has beaten down technology stocks across the board - not even sparing those acknowledged as solid leaders. In fact, only two stocks we tracked in the NW200 Index ended the year, on March 30, with a higher price than the day we began: PeopleSoft and SunGard Data Systems. Certainly none of the 10 network companies Network World named as most powerful in our year-end 2000 Power Issue has seen its stock price grow in the same period. It's been an incredible, wild ride for most. For example, EMC saw its stock climb from $53.83 on NW200 Index launch day, April 10, 2000, to $104.90 in September, only to be chopped by two-thirds by March. The drop followed analyst downgrades foretelling soft storage sales. And that's nothing compared to the roller-coaster rides by the stocks of Check Point Software, IBM and Veritas Software.

Overall performance
The performance of network companies, shown in the NW200 Index chart, heavily influences the overall stock market.


The dot-com crash that hurt the Nasdaq so badly last spring struck seven days before our index kickoff. Although the NW200 Index doesn't include any dot-coms, on April 15, 2000, it still dropped 30 points - losing nearly 10% of its value in a single day - to 169.77, reflecting Wall Street's general backlash against technology stocks.

Three days later, the NW200 Index feinted a rally. It even hovered in the high 180s for a week late in the month, pulled along by the strong performances of Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Oracle, SBC Communications and Sun.

But the optimism didn't last long. In May 2000, the mood shifted ominously and the NW200 Index retreated. On May 23, it landed at 159.19. The downturn actually began earlier that month with news that Novell would miss expected second-quarter earnings by half.

This was the start of a brutal year for Novell. Its share price dipped below the $10 mark in the summer and sank to less than $5 in January, compared to almost $20 per share last April. On March 12, with the stock price hovering in the $5 range for weeks, Eric Schmidt said he'd be handing over his CEO reigns to Jack Messman, president of acquisition target Cambridge Technology Partners, once that buyout closes.

Throughout the summer and early fall, the NW200 Index boiled and reduced. Strong overall summer performances by Dell, EMC, Gateway, IBM, SBC and Sun tempered the heat Wall Street gave HP, 3Com, Lucent and Microsoft. The NW200 Index floated near or above 170 in June and early July, but never again reached 180. The bottom dropped out on Nov. 30, to 119.74, in the wake of the never-ending presidential election, missed-profit warnings by PC mammoths Dell and Gateway, and growing problems at Microsoft, HP, AT&T and Lucent.

The uncertainty of a breakup, called for by U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson on June 7, dragged down Microsoft's stock all summer, as the case moved from verdict to appeals. Then, came other problems - slower-than-hoped-for Windows 2000 adoption and uncertainty about the .Net platform. On Jan. 1, the stock tumbled to $43.38 after the news that Microsoft would miss second-quarter expectations.

Charting NW200 companies
While stock performances for individual companies varied wildly, these six patterns were most common.


HP burned even worse in the summer heat. One year into CEO Carly Fiorina's reign, HP's stock spiked between the high 60s and the low 50s until September, when it began sinking. News of a planned $17 billion acquisition of PriceWaterhouseCoopers dropped HP's stock to the 40s. With missed fourth-quarter projections, HP dropped those plans in November; its stock hit the 30s. On March 1, the stock dropped to its 52-week low to $27.60 on news that HP would kill its OpenMail product. Last week, HP's troubles worsened when it warned that it would miss its second-quarter expectations by a wide margin and layoff 3,000 people. Oddly, investors applauded the cost-cutting move. On the day of the announcement, April 18, its stock rose about $3 to trade in the low 30s.

As for Lucent, a biplane stunt devil couldn't pull off such a steep nose-dive. In early July 2000, the stock traded at around $60. The next week it turned south, to the mid 40s, starting a lunge from which it has yet to stabilize. In October, after CEO Richard McGinn issued Lucent's third warning of missed quarterly expectations in 2000, the board booted him out. Still, the stock continued downward, to about $14 in mid-February and $11.52 on March 12. In a mere eight months, Lucent spilled off 81% of its market value.

July was painful for 3Com, too. Its stock bottomed out on July 28, when the company completed the spinoff of its profitable Palm division.

But March was the blackest month of all for the index. On March 12, Cisco announced layoffs, triggering a massive high-tech sell-off. The industry's poster child was fried a month earlier by failing to meet its second-quarter projections for the first time in a decade. Its stock fell from the high 60s in May 2000 to below $30 in January and continued downward, with nearly each day in March bringing it another 52-week low. On March 30, the sickly stock closed at $15.81.

The NW200 Index mimicked Cisco's illness, as did the Dow and Nasdaq. On March 21, the NW200 sagged to its all-time low, 113.37, smacked down by one company after another missing quarterly targets or announcing layoffs.

As the first year of the NW200 Index closes, a new motto for the network industry is materializing. What goes down, must come up.

Related links

Judge orders Microsoft breakup
Network World, 06/07/00

Cisco slashes Q3 estimates, takes $3.7 billion charge
Network World, 04/16/01

HP misses fourth-quarter expectations, drops PricewaterhouseCooper plans
Network World, 11/13/00

Lucent's explanations are wearing thin
The Edge, 10/14/00

Company profiles
Check Point Software
Cisco
Hewlett-Packard
IBM
Lucent
Microsoft
Novell
PeopleSoft
3com

 

Send this article to a colleague

Recipient's name:

Recipient's e-mail:
Your name:

Your e-mail:
Comments:

Feedback

Tell us your thoughts on this article or the issues raised in it. We'll cc: the author and editors on all comments.

Comments:

Name:
E-mail address:

Can we post your comments in an online forum on the topic?
Yes No

What did you think of this article?
Very useful Somewhat useful Not at all useful

Would you want to see:
More articles on this topic
Fewer articles on this topic

Thank you! When you click Submit, you'll be taken back to this article.



Responsible for insuring the safety of your network?

NWFusion offers two FREE security e-mail newsletters to help you keep your enterprise network secure.

Click here to sign-up.

Advertisement:


Editorial Partners program
Three free and easy ways to bring Network World's in-depth editorial content to your own Web site.
Learn more



  Copyright, 1995-2002 Network World, Inc. All rights reserved.