- Cool Yule Tools: 2008 Holiday Gift Guide
- 10 kitchen gadgets for the geek gourmet
- Google admits to violating iPhone development terms
- Smartphone smackdown: Storm vs. iPhone
- Google layoffs: 10,000 jobs being cut
![]() |
![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
One of my secret little indulgences is watching the reality TV show "The Apprentice." Seems to me, the network industry's merger-and-acquisition activity could be the basis for an "Apprentice"-like spin-off. Maybe I'd call it "The Network Maverick" because our industry is flush with unconventional vendor pairings led by flamboyant dealmakers. I'm envisioning a show in which each episode documents a transaction's progress, complete with backstabbing executive wars and rabid shareholder proxy fights all leading up to the "You're fired!" boardroom final scene. (Wouldn't you just love to see former HP CEO Carly Fiorina or ex-PeopleSoft CEO Craig Conway as guest stars?)
After the boardroom scene it would be time to pull on viewers' heartstrings. Pan to a black limo. Inside it, the lone, rejected ex-CEO would sit, head bent, as the car drives off to the newly paid-off, multimillion "golden parachute" villa in the hills. Not quite the same as watching disgraced CEOs leaving the job in handcuffs, but the fallout from corporate mergers can provide fascinating footage all the same.
"The Network Maverick" 2005 season undoubtedly would include many cliffhanger episodes, along the lines of juicy deals like
SBC/AT&T, Verizon/Qwest/MCI and Microsoft/Groove Networks. Now that acquisitions are clearly back in favor, a good number
of vendors may grow more interested in playing to their potential acquirers (other vendors) than to their potential customers.
Another book-cooking theme might even crop up in some future "Network Maverick" season. So I'd set the show up to include
a panel of network executives acting as "judges" on the deals, too - "American Idol"-style.
Judges wouldn't have voting rights over the deals in progress (those would be for board members and stockholders alone). But they could offer objective analysis on the potential merits and pitfalls of each deal and tell the audience when they thought the numbers seemed cooked. They could point out to the audience how mergers between midsize companies often indicate that a particular technology niche has moved past puberty and is officially mature and the only way to grow the business is to buy a competitor (Oracle/PeopleSoft) - or to partner with a somewhat unlikely mate so it can move into new markets (Symantec/Veritas Software). Judges also could articulate the perils of such business strategy pointing out that failures might take years to materialize (HP/Compaq).
Comment