- Cool Yule Tools: 2008 Holiday Gift Guide
- 10 kitchen gadgets for the geek gourmet
- Google admits to violating iPhone development terms
- Smartphone smackdown: Storm vs. iPhone
- Google layoffs: 10,000 jobs being cut
Nemertes assessed costs by vendor. It's important to note that these costs reflect the average of actual dollars spent by the 65 companies surveyed, divided by the number of end users on the VoIP system at the time of the study. Nemertes anticipates some changes to these numbers as companies add more users to current systems.
• Companies with fewer than 1,000 end users: Avaya is highest, followed by Nortel and Cisco . ShoreTel, designed primarily for small and midsize businesses, is significantly less expensive, validating customer feedback that its system is easy to use and install.
• Companies with more than 1,000 end users: Cisco is highest, followed by Nortel, Avaya and ShoreTel.
Avaya was the highest in both size categories, while Nortel had the lowest costs for fewer than 1,000 end users, and ShoreTel had the lowest costs per unit for more than 1,000 units.
According to the research, companies that install Cisco to a large number of locations, and hence, a large number of users, tend to install a Call Manager in multiple locations, raising the cost per unit. Additionally, they often find their routers at remote locations are incompatible with the VoIP system, and they must upgrade mid-project - again adding time and costs to the rollout.
Avaya's cost per unit drops for installations of more than 1,000 units, illustrating that the bulk of its operational costs are in the installation and troubleshooting of the switch itself. Once that's up and running, expanding the system out to thousands of users drastically lowers the cost per unit. Also, many of the companies that are using Avaya's equipment are extremely concerned about redundancy, so they have purchased more than one IP PBX, which raises the cost - particularly when assessing it per user for smaller installations.
Nortel, on the other hand, has a fairly good handle on pricing - it's not too high in any category and typically represents an "average" or "fair" cost when measured by unit.
ShoreTel's cost per unit is lowest in every category except capital costs and total costs for small rollouts.
For new buildings, cabling costs can be a huge number in the "savings" column. Companies report saving 20% to 40% by running wiring for one network instead of two. Advertising and communications firm inChord Communications, for example, slashed 40% on cabling cost in its new building, from $252,000 to $180,000.
Partner Content
The Foundry Enterprise Advantage
Foundry Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: FDRY) is a leading provider of high-performance enterprise and service provider switching, routing, security and Web traffic management solutions. Foundry's customers include the world's premier ISPs, metro service providers, and enterprises.
For further information on Foundry Networks please click here.
Leveraging the Advantages
of a Multi-vendor Network Strategy
Today's enterprise network provides more than simply a technology infrastructure. It's an enabler for the enterprise, supporting mission critical applications, creating operational efficiencies and increasing productivity gains. Foundry Networks provides the ideal foundation for a multi-vendor network.
Click here to view whitepaper!
Comments (1)
VoIP Vendor stack upBy Anonymous on May 15, 2008, 3:23 pmNot a single mention of 3Com
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments