Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

(Comma separation for multiple addresses)
Your Message:
Cisco vs. Microsoft
Cisco: It's all about the hardware | Cisco Case study: Bank shaves 40% off telecom costs Microsoft: It's all about software | Microsoft case study: Gibson Guitar strikes chord with unified communications | Slideshow: Side-by-side comparison of Cisco and Microsoft unified communications solutions

Cisco: It's all about the hardware

Network-based approach offers single-vendor solution for all types of devices
By Jim Duffy , Network World , 06/02/2008
  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Cisco's approach to unified communications is a network-based, hardware-intensive implementation designed to provide support for more environments – like point-of-sale systems, non-PC workgroups and mobile device platforms – than desktop- or server-based strategies.


Read how Microsoft approaches unified communications.
Watch our head-to-head comparison of Cisco vs. Microsoft UC solutions.


But like Microsoft and its Windows desktop/server-based unified communications vision, Cisco's plan is founded on protecting its business and selling as much Cisco equipment into the enterprise as possible.

"Both of them want pretty much a single vendor solution with the exception that I don't see any indication, nor should there be, that Cisco would go into the e-mail, messaging or calendaring area," says Elizabeth Herrell, an analyst at Forrester Research. "But other than that they all want to say we're one vendor, buy it all from us."

Indeed, a description of Cisco's all-encompassing unified communications portfolio begins with a listing of virtually every enterprise router in the Cisco inventory, from the 800 series to the 7500 series. It also includes five models from the company's Catalyst switch line as well as various gateways and access devices.

In all, 29 infrastructure products are included in Cisco's unified communications portfolio. And that doesn't include the 92 other customer contact, IP telephony, unified communications applications, collaboration – including WebEx – and voice network management tools that fill out Cisco's unified communications roster.

Analysts say Cisco's all-in-one, largely proprietary approach provides reliability, greater control, and consistent security and QoS from the endpoint through the network. But therein lies its downside as well – an environment requiring lots of devices and limited inclusion of non-Cisco gear.

"What's thrown back at Cisco is just the fact that they do require a lot of different servers for specific capabilities," says Matthias Machowinski, directing analyst for enterprise voice and data at Infonetics Research. "That seems to be their main knock whereas some other vendors are more integrated, especially once you scale down. If you're a company with 100 people and now you have to deploy 10 servers for [unified communications], that's going to be a problem."

The Cisco view

Cisco says that characterization is not entirely accurate.

"I describe our strategy as an 'and' strategy, not an 'or' strategy," says Christopher Thompson, senior director of UC solutions marketing at Cisco. "Many of our customers have Microsoft desktops and they will be using OCS, and we will make sure that we interoperate with OCS. It's an inclusive strategy."

Thompson also says it's not true that Cisco unified communications requires many servers – that some of Cisco's customers can deploy UCM Business Edition, for up to 500 users, on a single server.

At the heart of Cisco's unified communications portfolio is Unified Communications Manager, the call processing component of the environment. UCM is designed to deliver voice, video, mobility and presence services to IP phones, media processing devices, VoIP gateways, mobile devices, and multimedia applications, combining these resources into a "workspace" for up to 60,000 users.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Comments (9)
Login
Forgot your account info?

It ain't easy being green...By Anonymous on June 2, 2008, 11:24 amCisco: The "Green" Server Farm. Maybe they are going to paint all the routers and servers green and say they are the greenest in IT...

Reply | Read entire comment

Migrationally challenged...By Anonymous on June 2, 2008, 11:39 amUCM Business Edition is a packaging exercise created to compete with other vendor's offers in the space. Ask Mr. Thompson about redundancy or the migration to 501...

Reply | Read entire comment

Lego Blocks for VoIP (and UC?) By Anonymous on June 2, 2008, 7:18 pmThanks. Good article, bringing out the hardware-centric and server-intensive nature of Cisco's design. The Cisco claims are typically over-reaching, such as, "SIP-implementation...

Reply | Read entire comment

Why is the print version of article is different from the web veBy Anonymous on June 3, 2008, 7:57 pmThe web version is missing the last paragraph that appears on the print version.Where is the rest of the article? The print version is also cut short with the sentence...

Reply | Read entire comment

Cisco development ecosystem?By Anonymous on June 4, 2008, 11:55 amMy experience with Cisco's channel and system integration partners around the bay area convinces me that they can provide very little help of any type.

Reply | Read entire comment

dude skinny is as much aBy Anonymous-99 on June 4, 2008, 1:34 pmdude skinny is as much a modification of sip as it is of h323... if you actually look at it you'll see its very similar to mgcp and not h323/sip.

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed