Search /
Docfinder:
Advanced search  |  Help  |  Site map
RESEARCH CENTERS
SITE RESOURCES
Click for Layer 8! No, really, click NOW!
Networking for Small Business
TODAY'S NEWS
Valentine's Day Patch Tuesday: Microsoft to issue 9 patches, 4 critical
Mobile World Congress sneak peek: Quad-core smartphones, Ice Cream Sandwich & more
Microsoft details 'Windows on ARM' program
March debut of 'iPad 3' a sure bet, says analyst
FBI unbolts Steve Jobs 1991 investigation file
Cisco boosted profit, sales in Q2 while cutting costs
Macs take on the enterprise
Four crazy tech ideas from Google's Solve for X project
Obama 2012 campaign playlist revealed courtesy of Spotify
Oracle buying Taleo for US$1.9 billion in direct hit at SAP
Amazon attacks Apple: You get 3 Kindle products for price of iPad 2
Pre-rendered pages highlight latest Google Chrome release
Microsoft exec: Lync-Skype integration a 'compelling opportunity'
The future of hypervisors
/

Client interoperability

Related linksToday's breaking news
Send to a friendFeedback


Generally, remote access client interoperability is not a big concern. Most companies have only a small number of remote access gateways and will typically select a single vendor to provide the gateways for their users. The client software provided by the gateway vendor is then the obvious choice for the company.

Two companies have made a business of providing interoperable clients for IP Security (IPSec) access to enterprise networks. Safenet (formerly IRE) sells its Windows-only client in an OEM configuration to many VPN vendors. Network Associates' PGP division offers Windows and Macintosh versions of an IPSec client application. We invited Safenet to come in for a brief interoperability test to see how well things would work.

Results were mixed. In the best case, Nokia and Check Point Software gateways take Safenet as a completely compatible client right out of the starting gate. Some gateways, including those from Nortel, Lucent, Cisco and Secure Computing, required that we make minor changes to our profiles before they would handle Safenet clients properly. Other gateways, such as those from Avaya, Microsoft and Hewlett-Packard, were unfriendly to foreign clients. They wouldn't work unless the client looked like a gateway with a static IP address, which is not generally useful for remote access client configurations. Finally, other vendors, including Cisco with its PIX entry, the configuration of the system was so restricted that by adding client compatibility we broke site-to-site interoperability.

Back to the main review

RELATED LINKS

Related links

Snyder is a senior partner at Opus One in Tucson, Ariz. He can be reached at Joel.Snyder@opus1.com.

How we did it
Our testing methods revealed.

Scorecard and NetResults

Tech Insider: VPN service providers
There are plenty of options if you want to outsource your VPN.
Network World, 08/14/00.

Telecom tracker: Virtual private networks
Our guidelines for choosing what type of connection to use for VPNs will tell you how DSL stacks up against alternatives.
Network World, 09/03/01.

Research: VPNs
Links to information about VPNs from Network World Fusion.


NWFusion offers more than 40 FREE technology-specific email newsletters in key network technology areas such as NSM, VPNs, Convergence, Security and more.
Click here to sign up!
New Event - WANs: Optimizing Your Network Now.
Hear from the experts about the innovations that are already starting to shake up the WAN world. Free Network World Technology Tour and Expo in Dallas, San Francisco, Washington DC, and New York.
Attend FREE
Your FREE Network World subscription will also include breaking news and information on wireless, storage, infrastructure, carriers and SPs, enterprise applications, videoconferencing, plus product reviews, technology insiders, management surveys and technology updates - GET IT NOW.