Search /
Docfinder:
Advanced search  |  Help  |  Site map
RESEARCH CENTERS
SITE RESOURCES
Click for Layer 8! No, really, click NOW!
Networking for Small Business
TODAY'S NEWS
First iPhone worm spreads Rick Astley wallpaper
Four reasons to buy (and one reason to avoid) the Droid
Stimulus for tech and telecom $3B, but jobs still guesswork
Cisco MARS shuts out new third-party security devices
Verizon Droid buzz muted in Boston
Week in Google news: Google Dashboard, Droid fever, focus on e-commerce
Cloud computing, virtualization proponents getting antsy
Data center start-up offers energy saving software
Vendors scrambling to fix bug in Net's security
Judge dismisses lawsuit challenging Gartner's Magic Quadrant
Boston Celtics clamp down on spam
Cloud computing inevitable? Not so fast, educator says
Blue Coat slashes staff, buys S7 services company
Apple seeks new sheriff to lock up iPhones
Convergence /

Switch jitters

Related linksToday's breaking news
Send to a friendFeedback


While low latency is critical for delay-sensitive voice or video, it's not the only requirement. Delay also should remain constant from frame to frame. Some voice and video applications are even more sensitive to variations in latency than latency itself.

To see how well Enterasys Networks' Matrix E1 handles latency variation, we measured the delay added for every single frame we offered (more than 2 billion frames in some tests) and noted the difference between minimum and maximum measurements per stream.

In nearly all cases, latency variation was about the same or greater than the latency measurement.


Review: Enterasys 10G switch goes its own way - fast
How we did it


Latency for 1,518-byte frames with 250 logical hosts per interface was around 47 microseconds. But maximum latency averaged about 93 microseconds per stream, and minimum latency averaged about 28 microseconds per stream. The result is an average latency range of about 65 microseconds, 28% higher than average latency.

The variations aren't enough to upset most applications by themselves; performance degradation really begins to show up in the millisecond range. However, two factors are worth bearing in mind. First, we ran our tests on a congestion-free network. In a congested network queuing certainly will add to latency, and latency variation will only make matters worse.

Second, latency and latency variation are cumulative, so a network comprised of many Enterasys devices might begin to show significant latency variation. Given the low-microsecond delay numbers posted by the Matrix E1, this second factor probably won't be a concern for any but the largest enterprise networks.

RELATED LINKS


NWFusion offers more than 40 FREE technology-specific email newsletters in key network technology areas such as NSM, VPNs, Convergence, Security and more.
Click here to sign up!
New Event - WANs: Optimizing Your Network Now.
Hear from the experts about the innovations that are already starting to shake up the WAN world. Free Network World Technology Tour and Expo in Dallas, San Francisco, Washington DC, and New York.
Attend FREE
Your FREE Network World subscription will also include breaking news and information on wireless, storage, infrastructure, carriers and SPs, enterprise applications, videoconferencing, plus product reviews, technology insiders, management surveys and technology updates - GET IT NOW.
* HOME    * RESEARCH CENTERS     * NEWS     * EVENTS

Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy | How to Advertise
Reprints and links | Partnerships | Subscribe to NW
About Network World, Inc.

Copyright, 1994-2006 Network World, Inc. All rights reserved.