Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

Windows patch management tools

PatchLink Update's flexibility helped it best three other products tested.
By Mandy Andress, Network World Global Test Alliance , Network World , 03/03/2003
Newsletter Signup
  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

With Microsoft releasing more than 230 security bulletins since the beginning of 2000 - most of those requiring some sort of corrective action to fix a hole in one of its Windows-based products - the numbers speak for themselves: Windows patch management in an enterprise environment is a nightmare.

We tested four stand-alone Windows patch management products - BigFix's Enterprise Suite, Gravity Storm Software's Service Pack Manager 2000, PatchLink's Update and Shavlik Technologies' HfNetChk Pro to find out if they improve patch deployment. (See "Not in the game" for declining vendors.)


What about Microsoft?
Not in the game
Tracking missing patches (chart)
Patch management platform support (chart)
How we did it
NetResults
Archive of Network World reviews
Subscribe to the Product Review newsletter


Patch management tools should identify accurately which patches are missing on each system, provide an easy means to deploy patches and provide administrative reports tracking patch status across multiple machines.

The products we tested (see How we did it) attack the problem in two ways - with or without agent software. Agent-based products - such as those from PatchLink and BigFix - can greatly reduce network traffic by offloading processing and analysis to the target system, saving data until it needs to report to the central server. But they also force an administrator to manage software on all systems the product analyzes.

With agentless products - such as those from Shavlik and Gravity Storm - you don't have any distributed management issues, but whenever a scan is requested all tests and communications travel over the network. If scanning a domain with a large number of systems, the increase in network traffic can be quite significant.

PatchLink's Update 4.0 earned the Network World Blue Ribbon award for its ease of use, flexibility, automation and letting you easily create deployment packages.

PatchLink has two components - PatchLink Update Server and the agent. The Update Server is installed on a Windows 2000 Server with SP2 and Internet Information Server (IIS). The installation process sets up a Microsoft Data Engine (MSDE) database, which can be upgraded to a full SQL Server after installation. This upgrade is recommended for large organizations.

You easily can push the agents to targeted machines using the Agent Install Wizard, or agents can be installed during the logon process.

For management purposes, administrators connect to the PatchLink server through a Web interface, which lets you view reports, deploy packages, create packages and view system inventory.

PatchLink, the company, monitors Microsoft and other vendors, such as Citrix Systems and Adobe, for newly released patches. PatchLink engineers test the patches, put them into PatchLink's proprietary package format and deploy them to customers' local PatchLink servers through a periodic subscription-checking process, which occurs over Secure Sockets Layer at a time the administrator configures.

Administrators receive e-mail informing them of a new patch on the PatchLink server. If it is a critical patch, it also is downloaded to the Update Server on the customer's network. Noncritical patches will be downloaded at the administrator's request.

PatchLink automatically caches critical patches on the Update Server, a marked difference from BigFix and the agentless products. Caching patches is useful and the recent Sapphire/Slammer SQL Server worm proves the point. If a worm or other malicious act is taking place that slows down the Internet, how will administrators download patches to their critical servers? With cached patches, you already have the files at your location.

On the other hand, cached patches must be stored somewhere, so your system needs to include adequate disk space.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print
Comments (7)
Login
Forgot your account info?

patch managementBy markvcam on April 30, 2009, 9:37 amGFI have a very interesting article on their site explaining why patch management is important and how it can be made easier with GFI LANguard. Check it out: http://www.gfi.com/lannetscan/patch-management.htm

Reply | Read entire comment

hmmmBy Anonymous on February 17, 2009, 9:56 amthis was reviewed in 2003... please test newer products and let us know!

Reply | Read entire comment

ShavlikBy Anonymous on January 13, 2009, 8:35 amYes I aggree with you about it being terrible at multi-server deployments. We cannot have more than one engineer using Shavlik at the same time which causes terrible...

Reply | Read entire comment

ShavlikBy Anonymous on December 2, 2008, 3:00 amShavlik could not be easier to use, I have been using it for years without any real hassles. However their recent licensing change has made our renewal costs quadruple...

Reply | Read entire comment

ShavlikBy Anonymous on August 12, 2008, 5:48 pmI find Shavlik very difficult if not impossible to deploy to multiple computers at the same time. I don't have time to setup each and every computer in my network....

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed