- Is the Cisco MARS mission going to abort?
- First iPhone worm spreads Rick Astley wallpaper
- 10 stunning 3D buildings made with Google SketchUp
- Open source software ready for big business
- Four reasons to buy (and one reason to avoid) the Droid
Our test environment consisted of six routed Fast Ethernet subnet domains and a T-1 Internet connection. The Internet link let us perform massive zone transfers and other large-scale IP address operations, but most of our testing was local.
We ran VitalQIP and the Meta IP management console on a four-way Compaq ProLiant ML570 700 MHz computer with Pentium III CPUs, 2G-bytes of RAM and six 18G-byte SCSI RAID drives. The operating system was Windows 2000 Advanced Server with Service Pack 4. MetaInfo sent us an SA-500 DNS/DHCP appliance, while ApplianSys shipped both a DNSBox 300 DNS/DHCP Master and a DNSBox 100 DNS Slave appliance.
Each subnet's 25 client computers were a mix of Win 2000 Professional, NT Workstation 4.0, Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows XP, Red Hat Linux 7.0 and Macintosh platforms. The relational databases on the network were Oracle 8i, Sybase Adaptive Server 11.5 and Microsoft SQL Server 2000. Win 2000 and NetWare 5.1 shared files, while Internet Information Server, Netscape and Apache software served up Web pages. An Agilent Advisor protocol analyzer decoded and displayed network traffic.
We tested each product's ability to dynamically distribute IP addresses, equate IP addresses to host names, register IP addresses in directory/name resolution services and maintain a repository of IP addresses and host names. We also looked for scalability, security, ease of use and task automation.
To simulate a high volume of DNS/DHCP requests, we ran several concurrent instances of a C++ program that issued both valid and invalid DHCP-DISCOVER messages. To test performance, we measured how quickly each DHCP server responded to 50,000 IP address requests. We also moved clients from one subnet to another, gave unique values to the DHCP client ID field and assigned different values to the user class ID and vendor class ID DHCP parameters to see how the DHCP servers responded.
We invited all major vendors with IP address management products to participate in the test. Cisco, Nortel, Nominum, Incognito, EfficientIP, BlueCat, Infoblox and Process Software either declined or did not respond to our invitation.
Rss FeedRss Feed
The Leader in Network Knowledge
Partner Content
Blue Stripe Software
www.bluestripe.com/
Improving Application Performance Troubleshooting
Diagnosing why an application is slow is hard, at times taking days or weeks to isolate and resolve. This paper explains the challenges involved using current management tools, provides a 'wish list' for application management and analysis, and explains the need for an application system-wide approach that monitors entire applications, not components.
Download Whitepaper
Virtual Vigilance: Managing Application Performance in Virtual Environments
This paper highlights the impact of virtualization on application performance. "Managing Application Performance in Virtual Environments" states: "Best-in-Class organizations are predominately taking actions around improving visibility across both physical and virtual systems, assessing the business impact of application performance and understanding interdependencies of applications in virtualized environments."
Download Whitepaper
Application Service Requests: The Missing Link for Pragmatic ITSM
Forrester Research analyst Glenn O'Donnell and BlueStripe co-founder Vic Nyman discuss a breakthrough approach to application problem management. Learn the new approach for ITSM problem management, which provides: Rapid isolation of application slow-downs to specific components for quick problem resolution, 24/7 monitoring for proactive notification of potential issues before end users are impacted and much more.
Register for Webcast
Comment