- More porn sneaks onto the iPhone
- 'Swatting' case shows need to ban caller-ID spoofing
- Why the iPhone can't be "killed"
- Nortel enterprise chief wants to bring back Bay
- US sets final emergency responder wireless pilot
In 25 years, desktop storage has jumped from the IBM PC with a 360K-byte floppy drive to Buffalo Technology's TeraStation, which offers 1T byte of capacity. We can make a good case for small businesses, workgroups at larger businesses, and even upscale home networks (digital video fans gobble gigabytes like candy) to plop down $1,000 for a terabyte of disk storage.
While Buffalo says the TeraStation combines ease of use with enterprise-class features, we were a bit skeptical. True, the installation of the network-attached storage (NAS) box was quick and easy, and you can apply the enterprise label because of the terabyte capacity. But any enterprise-class storage device should include more management tools, directory integration and hot-swappable disk drives, all lacking in the TeraStation.
Installation included automatically finding an open IP address upon booting (once we gave the administrator password to enable client DHCP settings) and making an easy connection from a Windows client running the management utility from an enclosed CD. TeraStation only supports Linux connections via Server Message Block Windows networking, but our Xandros 3.0 Linux Desktop had no problem accessing the unit that way. Default settings include enabling AppleShare but not FTP (having anonymous FTP access on by default isn't secure), and the four Western Digital 243G-byte disk drives are set to spanning mode, pooling all the disk space into one huge volume.
You can run the system in Standard Mode, where each disk becomes a separate volume; Mirroring Mode, where pairs of disks match up in a RAID-1 mirror configuration, which gives you two fault-tolerant 500M-byte volumes; or RAID-5 mode, which cuts the disk space by 25%, to 750G bytes, but increases performance and fault tolerance to survive a failure of any one disk. A journaling file system also improves reliability, mounting speed and failure recovery. These are high-end storage features, and if the drives were hot-swappable we wouldn't argue about the enterprise label.
Although usable space only showed 928G bytes after installation, the TeraStation still had more capacity to fill than our lab could cram onto it. Performance matched the lower-end NAS products we've tried because the four drives are Integrated Drive Electronics (IDE) rather than SCSI, spin at 7,200 rpm, and have only a 2M-byte buffer. As the price of Serial ATA drives drop, Buffalo could improve performance by upgrading its Ultra ATA/100 drives to SATA and leveraging the 8M-byte buffers standard with drives using that interface. The lone Ethernet port on the TeraStation auto-senses between 10M-, 100M- and 1G-bit speeds, and supports Jumbo Frames. Again, this was an interesting mix of high- and low-end features.
Partner Content
Explore the Ultrium Edge
The powerful tape technology can address data security with tape encryption as well as long term data protection.
Find Out More
Disk and Tape Square Off
Discover what disk and tape really cost and which solution provides lower total cost of ownership and optimizes energy use for your organization
Download this White Paper
Don't Fall for the Myths
The Clipper Group explores the truth behind the myths of tape, digging into the misconceptions in the disk vs. tape debate.
Review this information
information examination
An examination of information security issues, methods and securing data with LTO-4 tape drive encryption
Read this analysis
Comments (2)
Buffalo Tera StationBy Marvin on July 25, 2008, 4:57 amI purchased the 2TB Tera Station 2 years ago. Have 7 workstations accessing it constantly as the file server, and it has been flawless. I would purchase one again...
Reply | Read entire comment
RE: Buffalo TeraStation NAS boxBy techedge on November 15, 2007, 8:43 pmthis thing is a total piece of crap. - it is slow as hell - your data is totally insecure, what good is a raid 5 array on a drive with a non standard file allocation...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments