- Microsoft Windows chief decries standards grandstanding
- The 5 best, and 5 worst, features of Google Chrome OS
- Federal government using PS3 to crack pedophile passwords
- 10G Ethernet cheat sheet
- Top 10 free Windows tools for IT pros, at a glance
In this round of testing desktop-management software, we decided to analyze how well the tools performed from the perspective of five different roles, or sets of users. For example, looking at these products from the perspective of the help desk, we evaluated how well the products help diagnose and fix problems on remote desktops, and we looked at the deployment of software, imaging, personality transfer and upgrades.
We analyzed the products from the perspective of security in terms of patch management, anti-virus updates, and software application monitoring and metering. We also looked at the products' support for Cisco's Network Admission Control (NAC) and the protection they offered for mobile workers away from corporate networks.
We looked at these tools from the perspective of users - how well the products let them find and restore lost files, fix applications or reset their passwords. We took the perspective of IT executives in terms of how the offerings produced accurate and informative software and hardware inventories and useful reports for CIOs, and how they addressed day-to-day management issues at the operational level.
We invited several top desktop-management vendors to participate, as well as Altiris, LANDesk, Microsoft and Novell. CA had a new release of its Desktop Management Suite in beta, but it wasn't ready for release before we finished our testing. Numara Software (formerly Intuit) submitted its Track-It Enterprise product, which we reviewed separately, because it doesn't match up well with the other products tested.
|
Our Clear Choice Award goes to LANDesk for having a broad range of features that covered our five sets of users well, and had superior security features.
LANDesk has provided the broadest-possible level of platform support in all its products since we've been testing its gear. Version 8.6 of the LANDesk Management Suite is no exception: It supports multiple versions of Linux, Macintosh and Windows. The inclusion of the LANDesk Management Gateway makes it possible to manage a laptop or desktop system over the Internet. This release of Management Suite makes significant strides in its reporting capabilities. Previous versions delivered a set of canned reports and a simple report generator, but we found a more complete (although complex) capability in this release.
Partner Content
www.bmc.com
Gartner 2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling
Gartner has positioned BMC CONTROL-M in the Leaders Quadrant of their "2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling." The report assesses the ability to execute and completeness of vision of key vendors in the marketplace. Read a full copy today, courtesy of BMC Software.
Download whitepaper
Dell's SMART Approach to Workload Automation
Read a compelling case study by EMA, Inc. to learn how Dell uses BMC CONTROL-M to cut cost and increase productivity with workload automation.
Download whitepaper
Workload Automation Cost Savings 2 Minute Video
A major computer manufacturer uses BMC CONTROL-M and just four people to schedule and run over 85,000 jobs every month. By switching to BMC CONTROL-M, they more than quadrupled the workload without adding a single staff member. See how in this 2-minute video overview.
Go to video
Comments (3)
Asset Management on the cheapBy soggydog on May 9, 2008, 5:28 amHow do these functionally rich products compare to software like syncpro, at the cheaper end of the market but perhaps all some of us might need?! Do you have cost...
Reply | Read entire comment
Supporting technologiesBy marxtar on August 25, 2008, 3:50 pmFor those that have invested in LANDesk, take a look at MarXtar LANDesk Enhancements to see what else you can achieve with low or zero investment.
Reply | Read entire comment
LANDesk Management Suite versus Microsoft SMSBy Anonymous on May 20, 2009, 5:55 amWhich among the two is a better solution for network management? Does anyone has a documentation of the differences of the two solutions? Product comparison?
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments