Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close
Clear choice test: Compliance
Introduction | Complete scorecard | Conclusion | Test archive
Inside this test package
Compliance Product-by-product summary
Also:

How we tested 6 compliance products

By Mandy Andress, Network World Alliance , Network World , 06/12/2006

New Boundary and Elemental provided preconfigured servers running their management components. We installed the management components of all the other products on Windows 2003 servers with 3-GHz processors and 1GB RAM. We used VMware Workstation to support multiple products on the same server.

We first tested agent deployment and the products' ability to connect to hosts with agentless technology. We had a test bed of 10 hosts, comprising Windows XP, 2003, 2000, Linux and Solaris. We ran discovery scans to identify systems not running the necessary agent and deployed agents using the product console, if possible.

We reviewed out-of-the-box compliance policies for the regulatory standards and best-practice configuration guidelines of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, Gramm-Leach-Bliley legislation, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology. We launched scans of our test systems with some of the default policies and reviewed the results.

We then tested the products' ability to customize default templates and configure custom checks. We created checks to ensure Sophos Anti-Virus and the Windows firewall were running and Google Desktop's search-across-computers feature was not enabled. We checked Windows patch compliance, values in several registry keys, password settings and user account status on Windows 2003. For the Linux and Solaris systems, we evaluated several configuration checks and installed patches.

To assess the products' access-control features, we created several users with different permissions. We also attempted to create a user who could view only reports, ideally through a Web interface.

When issues were identified during compliance checks, we read through the resulting report to see what information was provided on the identified issue and how to correct it. We then tested the products' autoremediation functionality.

For reporting, we looked for the products' ability to export reports into multiple formats and autodeliver to a defined e-mail address after a scheduled policy check. We attempted to create a delta report showing the specific changes made to a system over a period of time. We also looked for a product audit trail that showed which users performed what actions within the system.

< Previous: Preventsys offers twist | Conclusion: Conclusion >

Partner Content

Brilliantly simple security and control solutions for email, web and endpoint

www.sophos.com

Stopping data leakage

Learn how to exploit your current security investment to control the information that flows into, through and out of your network.

Download the white paper.

Why detection rates aren't enough

Evaluating endpoint security products is a time-consuming and daunting task. Learn the six critical questions you need to ask to prospective vendors to get the right endpoint solution.

Download the white paper.

Unauthorized applications: Taking back control

Employees installing and using unauthorized applications like IM, VoIP, games and peer-to-peer file-sharing applications cause many businesses serious concern. How do you control these applications?

Download the white paper.

Comment
Login
Forgot your account info?
Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to moderator approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed
Save The Date!
What They Are Saying

Investment of a Technology should be 'held off' because there hasn't been enough investment in it yet? Is...- Anonymous

Join the Discussion