- Nokia's new N97 vs. the iPhone
- 10 Microsoft research projects
- Hard to get justice in MySpace case
- Smartphone smackdown: Storm vs. iPhone
- Apple removes antivirus support page
Monitoring tools that use agents offer excellent, detailed visibility into server and application behavior. But agents can be difficult to distribute, often consume server CPU and memory resources, and can be another point of failure within a server.
While an agent-less monitoring tool cannot supply the wealth of detail of an agent-based product, its simpler environment, reduced risk of crashing a server and easier deployment make it a compelling and tempting choice.
Heroix says its new Longitude 3.0 agent-less system can monitor a network well enough to give servers and applications the same uptime and availability as agent-based tools. We recently tested Heroix and found that it serves up a plethora of useful and timely data on server and application behaviors. It kept tabs on several specific server platforms and applications, was easy to deploy and use, produced helpful reports, and didn't cost an arm and a leg in license fees.
Partner Content
SMART Steps Toward Consolidated Workload Automation
Consolidating job scheduling into a single, comprehensive workload automation solution is a critical first step to effective workload automation (WLA).
White paper on WLA here
A Comprehensive Approach to Practicing ITIL Change Management
Read a compelling whitepaper by EMA, Inc. to learn best practices for integrating workload automation.
Whitepaper here
2 Minutes to IT workload automation
BMC CONTROL-M can put money back into your IT budget and strip the complexity and risk from workload automation.
View video here
Gain a faster, cheaper way to manage workload
BMC CONTROL-M can help you migrate to a workload automation solution to meet your organization’s goals.
Listen here for more info
Comment