- Mythbuster busts his own tale
- 10 open source companies to watch
- Sony recalls 73,000 Vaio laptops
- Tool to evade China's Web censorship
- Chrome and Firefox and add-ons
Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS
Every Wi-Fi vendor talks in their marketing material about scaling up for enterprise service, but how many actually walk the walk? We found out after conducting our largest Wi-Fi test ever.
Teaming with test-equipment vendor VeriWave, we assessed Wi-Fi controllers and access points the way they're used in large enterprises - with dozens of access points and hundreds of clients roaming simultaneously. Large-scale testing is a better predictor of performance in enterprise settings, and it's more stressful on the equipment than the usual method of running just a few FTP sessions on a small collection of access points.
Our testing turned up several surprises:
* Of the 19 vendors we invited, only two - Aruba Wireless Networks and Meru Networks - participated. Others weren't so eager to have 25 access points tested at the same time. To be fair, Trapeze Networks expressed interest, but new-product cycles prevented the company from participating. Other vendors either declined our invitation or were eerily silent in response to our requests (see "Running scared?" ).
* While Aruba's gear generally performed well, linear scalability isn't necessarily a given. We found cases where performance on a per-client basis is lower in tests with 25 access points than in tests with a single access point.
* Meru was a repeat victim of Murphy's Law. Configuration gremlins and problems in a beta version of its access points prevented the vendor from concluding our tests (see "Meru, meet Murphy").
* If you push hard enough, even the 802.11 standard will fall apart. Our tests uncovered a design flaw in the Wi-Fi specifications, and as a result the IEEE now is considering fixes for the forthcoming 802.11n and 802.11.2 standards (see "Breaking the standards" ).
In the end, Aruba's 5000 and 6000 controllers and Aruba 70 access points put up excellent numerical results in almost all our tests, earning the vendor a Clear Choice Award. The performance in some tests even exceeded theoretical limits, thanks to the vendor's use of a rarely implemented part of the 802.11 standard.

Discover the capabilities your file integrity monitoring solution should have to effectively secure...
Realizing the Potential of User-Generated and Social NetworkingCan communication service providers (CSPs) leverage Web 2.0 services and create new service...
Digital Asset Management StrategyThe reality of Dramatically changing media landscape, has created awareness within the media and...

The standard for Power over Ethernet (PoE), IEEE Std. 802.3af(tm)-2003, advanced networking,...
Intelligent Mobility: BlackBerry Technical Seminar 2008The virtual BlackBerry Technical Seminar keeps growing in popularity every year, and we want to...
Harnessing the power of communications to increase workplace performanceDue to the convergence of IT and telecommunications technologies, the business workplace has been...

WAN Ethernet services are reliable, cost-efficient offerings that are widely available and in a...
Comments (3)
Aruba conquers challenge of Wi-Fi scalabilityBy Anonymous on May 13, 2008, 7:40 pmOut of 19 vendors only 2 participated... This article would have been much more relevant if more vendors were included in the benchmark. Declaring a product clear...
Reply | Read entire comment
Meru was also present duringBy Anonymous on February 8, 2008, 3:30 pmMeru was also present during this test, read the report. Network World does not rig tests.
Reply | Read entire comment
RE: Aruba conquers challenge of Wi-Fi scalabilityBy thebadeye on October 12, 2007, 12:25 pmIf you held a foot race and only one person showed up, why would you hand out a trophy?????? Too funny! Best Question: If no one (but Aruba) showed because...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments