Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

(Comma separation for multiple addresses)
Your Message:

Exchange upgrade earns mixed grades

Mammoth upgrade hits on management, system security and availability, but stumbles with immature antispam wares
By Joel Snyder and Joel Snyder, Rodney Thayer, Tom Henderson, Network World Lab Alliance , Network World , 01/08/2007
  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Microsoft's recently released Exchange 2007 package is huge, literally. The reviewer's guide comprises 26,000 words, and the list of new features is 28 pages long. In this Clear Choice Test, we opted not to test every bit of code, but instead to dive deep in several critical areas important to large-scale deployments.

Overall, we found Exchange 2007's management and availability extensions are improved dramatically, and new architectural maneuvers have beefed up security, especially in the areas of compliance and e-mail policy management.

However, when we enabled Microsoft’s new antispam software on our Exchange 2007 deployment, we found that  it requires more engineering effort to compete with established vendors in that market.

Exchange 2007 is sized for the largest enterprises, because it requires 64-bit hardware. That signals that the product will need substantial hardware, software, network bandwidth and operations resources. We didn't run strenuous, repeatable benchmarks on Exchange 2007 for this features-based test.

 
MS antispam not on par with market leaders
In our test of the new antispam features shipping with Exchange 2007, Microsoft could not keep up with the market leaders' spam-catch rates or hold false-positive rates to acceptable levels.
Product Spam-catch rate False-positive rate
IronPort Anti-Spam 94% to 98% 0.1% to 0.4%
Symantec Brightmail 94% to 96% 0.2% to 0.5%
Exchange 2007 81% to 86% 2.1% to 2.3%
Barracuda Spam Firewall 79% to 84% 0.4%
Click to see: MS antispam

With Exchange 2007, Microsoft has solved one of the messaging platform's long-standing reliability issues by allowing for true database replication to independent storage subsystems. We used Exchange 2007's Cluster Continuous Replication service to build a cluster of two mailbox servers, each with independent disk storage. We turned off the cluster's active node and watched it continue to operate without a hitch.

The active/passive model consumes twice as many resources, depending on how the disk storage is replicated, but the cost of additional hardware could be low compared with the cost of losing an enterprise e-mail system.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Partner Content

Gartner 2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling

Gartner has positioned BMC CONTROL-M in the Leaders Quadrant of their "2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling." The report assesses the ability to execute and completeness of vision of key vendors in the marketplace. Read a full copy today, courtesy of BMC Software.

Download whitepaper

Dell's SMART Approach to Workload Automation

Read a compelling case study by EMA, Inc. to learn how Dell uses BMC CONTROL-M to cut cost and increase productivity with workload automation.

Download whitepaper

Workload Automation Cost Savings 2 Minute Video

A major computer manufacturer uses BMC CONTROL-M and just four people to schedule and run over 85,000 jobs every month. By switching to BMC CONTROL-M, they more than quadrupled the workload without adding a single staff member.  See how in this 2-minute video overview.

Go to video

Comments (1)
Login
Forgot your account info?

ExchangeBy Fred Mackie on February 16, 2009, 7:57 pmThere's virtual labs on the Microsoft Exchange Server in Depth website where you can test out Exchange Server 2007 before you invest and see for yourself.

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed