Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

(Comma separation for multiple addresses)
Your Message:
Clear Choice Test Network Management
Introduction | Complete scorecard | Test archive
Inside this test package
Product-by-product summary
Tests by topic

The blurred lines of network monitoring

When it makes sense to pay more for management tools
By Barry Nance , Network World , 02/12/2007
  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Why would a company of any size spend $50,000, $100,000 or more on HP's Network Node Manager, Alcatel-Lucent's VitalSuite, CA's eHealth or Spectrum, IBM's (formerly Micromuse's) NetCool, Argent's Guardian or other products if the entry-level products we tested are so capable? There are a few reasons.

* Sophistication: Their complexity lets the expensive tools monitor networks more accurately. For instance, you can avoid more false alarms with the expensive products, because you can set sophisticated thresholds: "Alert me if Link X's utilization exceeds 5% on Saturdays and Sundays, 20% after 8 p.m. during the week, 50% during weekdays or 75% at 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. on weekdays." The expensive products are also usually quite good at performing root-cause analysis.

*Scalability: The expensive products typically have a distributed, n-tier architecture that helps them scale upward to handle 100,000 or more network nodes.

*Integration: The expensive tools integrate well with third-party software and even with each other. For instance, both CA's eHealth and Spectrum products integrate with CA's network documentation tool, netViz.

* Specific device support: Understanding the Babel of languages emitted by a widely heterogeneous collection of network devices is another forté of the expensive tools. CA's eHealth, for instance, is an absolute polyglot that ships with more than 1,000 Management Information Bases.


Return to test introduction
  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Partner Content

Blue Stripe Software

www.bluestripe.com/

Improving Application Performance Troubleshooting

Diagnosing why an application is slow is hard, at times taking days or weeks to isolate and resolve. This paper explains the challenges involved using current management tools, provides a 'wish list' for application management and analysis, and explains the need for an application system-wide approach that monitors entire applications, not components.

Download Whitepaper

Virtual Vigilance: Managing Application Performance in Virtual Environments

This paper highlights the impact of virtualization on application performance.  "Managing Application Performance in Virtual Environments" states: "Best-in-Class organizations are predominately taking actions around improving visibility across both physical and virtual systems, assessing the business impact of application performance and understanding interdependencies of applications in virtualized environments."

Download Whitepaper

Application Service Requests: The Missing Link for Pragmatic ITSM

Forrester Research analyst Glenn O'Donnell and BlueStripe co-founder Vic Nyman discuss a breakthrough approach to application problem management. Learn the new approach for ITSM problem management, which provides: Rapid isolation of application slow-downs to specific components for quick problem resolution, 24/7 monitoring for proactive notification of potential issues before end users are impacted and much more.

Register for Webcast

Comment
Login
Forgot your account info?
Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed