- 4chan hell raisers finding fame brings heat?
- The 10 dumbest mistakes network managers make
- NetApp quits bidding war in face of EMC opposition
- CompuServe closes after 30 years
- Google to launch open-source Chrome OS this year
Apple's description of its latest Xserve, the Quad Xeon 64-bit server, is a bit of a misnomer. Though Intel makes a CPU called the Quad Core, this isn't it. This server sports twin Dual-Core Intel Xeon 5100 CPUs. Nomenclature aside, our Clear Choice Test of the Xserve found it performed much faster than the older Xserve G4 model we previously tested. It also has far greater memory and disk speed.
On the outside, the Xserve doesn't look much different from its predecessor, which has twin 32-bit PowerPC CPUs. We compiled programs and performed large file copies on the new model. Using the GNU gcc4 compiler, we found that compile times typically took an average of 10% of the time the Xserve G4 unit took. File copies, especially large files, were 65% to 82% faster on the new hardware than on the G4.
Some of the goodies crammed into the 1U rack frame include space for three Serial Advanced Technology Attachment (SATA) or Serial Attached SCSI (SAS) drives with as much as 2.1TB of storage and as much as 32GB of memory. This means that the new Xserve can be power hungry. It's fed by a 650-watt power supply with an optional redundant supply.
The densely packed Xserve includes two PCI Express card slots, one of which can be reconfigured to be an independent, bus-controlled PCI-X slot; we thought it might be full, but indeed there is still more. The independent PCI-X slot doesn't depend on the other slot, so it can run full speed. In other systems, the PCI-X bus speed often is throttled down to the lowest-speed card in the bus. Not so here.
There are two Gigabit Ethernet ports, two FireWire 800 ports on the rear and a FireWire 400 jack on the front. FireWire is Apple's name for the IEEE 1394 high-speed serial interface.
| NETWORK SERVER
APPLE XSERVE QUAD XEON |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Partner Content
Explore the Ultrium Edge
The powerful tape technology can address data security with tape encryption as well as long term data protection.
Find Out More
Disk and Tape Square Off
Discover what disk and tape really cost and which solution provides lower total cost of ownership and optimizes energy use for your organization
Download this White Paper
Don't Fall for the Myths
The Clipper Group explores the truth behind the myths of tape, digging into the misconceptions in the disk vs. tape debate.
Review this information
information examination
An examination of information security issues, methods and securing data with LTO-4 tape drive encryption
Read this analysis
Comments (72)
Apple is not ready for the EnterpriseBy Frustrated Apple Engineer on June 16, 2007, 7:22 pmFirst, I am in the US and work in IT for a huge Enterprise network. I need to work with *all* operating systems: Windows, Novell SUSE, Apple, Solaris in both server...
Reply | Read entire comment
Amen! Ignoring preferenceBy Anonymous on June 8, 2007, 1:08 pmAmen! Ignoring preference of one OS over another, I'd want to know why I not only have to pay several times more for Windows, but have to pay for the right to connect...
Reply | Read entire comment
I'm a bit puzzled by theBy Anonymous on June 8, 2007, 1:01 pmI'm a bit puzzled by the math here. If windows and os x cost the same amount, it would make sense for the macs to cost five times as much to keep up to date as...
Reply | Read entire comment
Apple's Supposed Enterprise ReadinessBy Al Snyder on June 7, 2007, 9:09 pmBefore buying into an Apple server platform, check out the tools available for disaster recovery. Three weeks ago, our Apple mail server developed a corrupt database....
Reply | Read entire comment
No freak'n way.By Anonymous on June 7, 2007, 4:38 pmI would be ashamed to use a MAC server in a big, corporate network.
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments