- 10 stunning 3D buildings made with Google SketchUp
- Vendors scrambling to fix bug in 'Net's security
- Microsoft Linux: Why one free software advocate wants it
- Verizon confirms Droid tethering option, hefty price tag
- Rackspace apologizes for cloud outage

Comments (8)
Where's Trixbox in your review?By Anonymous on April 9, 2007, 4:36 pmI like Trixbox. Why did you not include it? Re: IP PBXs built on open source software show promise.
Reply | Read entire comment
Trixbox is a FonalityBy Dan on April 9, 2007, 5:42 pmTrixbox is a Fonality product. Reviewing it would have been redundant. Trixbox is also not driven towards the commercial market by Fonality.
Reply | Read entire comment
trixbox is not all of fonalityBy Ian on April 9, 2007, 9:48 pmTrixbox eventhough is owned by Fonality it is open source and includes FreePBX, Operator panel, and a limited version of HUD. I think Trixbox carries the best of...
Reply | Read entire comment
Fonality submission to the NWW IP-PBX testBy Christine Burns, NWW testing editor on April 9, 2007, 11:30 pmThanks for your comments. We tested the product in the Fonality portfolio that the company chose to submit as is our standard operating procedure.
Reply | Read entire comment
Intuitive Voice Technology holds the ease of use trophyBy Greg on April 13, 2007, 10:15 amYou guys missed the best Asterisk PBX for ease of use. Intuitive Voice Technology holds the trophy in this area with its Evolution PBX.
Reply | Read entire comment
Would like to review TrxiBOX performance testsBy Gustavo on April 13, 2007, 4:59 pmPls be so kind to provide performance benchmarks and tests results of Trixbox, we are considering to explore the open source product. Also would like to know if...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments