- 4chan hell raisers finding fame brings heat?
- The 10 dumbest mistakes network managers make
- NetApp quits bidding war in face of EMC opposition
- CompuServe closes after 30 years
- Google to launch open-source Chrome OS this year
In the world of data-center computing, there's a lot of contention over whether deploying rackable servers is better than deploying blade servers to host consolidated or virtualized applications.
Because IBM has been a top performer in recent server tests, for this hands-on exploration of blades vs. rackable servers, we tested IBM's state of the art in both categories -- the HS21 and HS21 XM blades and the x3550 and x3650 rackables -- and focused on performance, power consumption and manageability.
Because blade offerings have at least some things in common, we believe these test results are applicable generally to blades from other vendors -- Dell and HP, for example -- though there may be vendor-specific considerations in assessing products from others.
We found that blade servers reduce but don't eliminate redundant hardware components requiring electrical power, a pivotal consideration in total cost of ownership (TCO). That said, while IBM's blade servers equaled the performance of its rackables, the blades were more power efficient and potentially much easier to service.
While rackables are less expensive than blades when buying only one or two servers, because you have to factor in the cost of the blade chassis, a fully configured blade chassis is the more economical hardware buy than purchasing the same number of rackable servers. On the other hand, adopting a blade configuration demands a vendor lock-in that rackables don't, because they can be added one at a time as needed. Also, blades fall short for applications that require large amounts of on-board storage.
| The Tally Blades vs. rackables: What's got the edge? This tally is based on our hands-on assessment of equivalent numbers of IBM XM blade servers and IBM x3550 and x3650 rackable servers. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Partner Content
Explore the Ultrium Edge
The powerful tape technology can address data security with tape encryption as well as long term data protection.
Find Out More
Disk and Tape Square Off
Discover what disk and tape really cost and which solution provides lower total cost of ownership and optimizes energy use for your organization
Download this White Paper
Don't Fall for the Myths
The Clipper Group explores the truth behind the myths of tape, digging into the misconceptions in the disk vs. tape debate.
Review this information
information examination
An examination of information security issues, methods and securing data with LTO-4 tape drive encryption
Read this analysis
Comments (3)
Other blade serversBy Anonymous on May 16, 2008, 1:56 pmSee http://blogs.sun.com/blades/entry/sun_blade_x8440_server_module for a perspective on another blade server. Lisa Curhan
Reply | Read entire comment
ThanksBy Anonymous on May 4, 2008, 4:55 amThanks for the wonderful article.
Reply | Read entire comment
RE: Blade servers vs. rack serversBy glen seimetz on January 31, 2008, 5:29 amgood article
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments