- More porn sneaks onto the iPhone
- 'Swatting' case shows need to ban caller-ID spoofing
- Why the iPhone can't be "killed"
- Nortel enterprise chief wants to bring back Bay
- US sets final emergency responder wireless pilot
The first variety -- sometimes referred to as native virtualization -- occurs when a hypervisor (also called a microkernel) directly virtualizes all host resources to multiple guest operating systems. That translates instructions that need systems resources on the fly via direct hardware-virtualization/system-instruction translation.
Direct translation presents a discrete virtual-machine appearance to each guest operating system and the applications riding on top of it.
Guest operating systems in this scheme don't need to be modified or be aware of the virtualized representation state of the hardware platform, because their resource needs are managed by the microkernel. VMware's ESX platform is a prime example of a direct hardware-virtualization system.
A variant of native virtualization is a process called client direct-processor emulation, where applications of another operating system are given operating-system resource-emulation capability. This scheme lets applications native to Windows XP work on Apple's Macintosh OS 10.4 using products from Parallels or Microsoft.
This is a scheme typically associated with desktop virtualization.
Partner Content
Explore the Ultrium Edge
The powerful tape technology can address data security with tape encryption as well as long term data protection.
Find Out More
Disk and Tape Square Off
Discover what disk and tape really cost and which solution provides lower total cost of ownership and optimizes energy use for your organization
Download this White Paper
Don't Fall for the Myths
The Clipper Group explores the truth behind the myths of tape, digging into the misconceptions in the disk vs. tape debate.
Review this information
information examination
An examination of information security issues, methods and securing data with LTO-4 tape drive encryption
Read this analysis
Comments (3)
RE: VM management tools from Microsoft, VMware, XenSource leaveBy Anonymous on November 19, 2007, 4:42 pmA majority of these vendors have lost focus on what’s a necessity in managing this virtual connection information. Its fine to have all of the bells and whistles...
Reply | Read entire comment
Creative ways to manage VMwareBy Micronet on September 21, 2007, 2:34 pmSee Microsoft Subnet for more Microsoft-related news, blogs, security alerts, technical group. This is a little bit off topic from the test, but still interesting...
Reply | Read entire comment
RE: VM management tools from Microsoft, VMware, XenSource leave room for improvementBy SUMj on September 17, 2007, 4:37 pmWe want to hear from YOU! Weigh in on these VM management tools, share your experiences or just let us know what you thought of the test results.
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments