- BlackBerry Storm vs. the iPhone
- Digg's Kevin Rose: "We have to do better"
- Blogger warns: "Nortel doesn't make it out alive"
- Financial quagmire bringing out the scammers
- Verizon plays with the wrong e-mail addresses
Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:Application Performance Solutions | App Performance | Networking Solution | SafeGuard Enterprise Solution Center | SOA | Test your Web Filter | Value of WDS
| Intro to UTM Testing | Testing categories | Product Summaries | Click tabs to expand |
|---|
Score: 3.99
Editor’s note: This is a summary of our testing of this product, for a full rundown of how it fared in our testing across 10 UTM categories, please see our full coverage.
Check Point and IBM jointly submitted an IBM System x3650 to highlight the high performance available in VPN-1. We used the IBM System x3650 as a base to run Check Point’s Secure Platform operating system and VPN-1 UTM software. Because the System x3650 is a multicore system, we also got to be early adopters of Check Point’s new CoreXL acceleration technology, which brings parallel processing on multicore systems to Check Point’s VPN-1 software.
At this time, though, CoreXL doesn’t support antivirus scanning, so the System x3650 did not include antivirus capabilities that we could test.
For a discussion of the Check Point firewall software running on the System x3650 server, see story about Check Point VPN-1 UTM Gateway. This summary discusses only the aspects of Check Point’s software specific to the System x3650 and the server itself.
For raw speed, the IBM System x3650 did a great job on the tasks we cared about most: IPS and firewall, at the same time. The x3650 also has great expansion capabilities, with four expansion slots, and the ability to plug in any multiport Ethernet card you might want, turning the IBM System x3650 into a system with a lot of Ethernet ports.
However, the IBM System x3650 is still essentially a server, which means that it has a lot of parts and a lot of engineering that is not relevant to making a firewall run fast. Because the IBM System x3650 fits into a commodity spot, it is very cost-effective at around $7,000 a system — compared with a slower Crossbeam C25, for $24,000, for example. But it’s also large — 2U high and 30 inches deep — and noisy and hot. The System x3650 also looks like a server, so such things as Ethernet ports are all on the rear side of the system, right there next to the power supply plugs.
If you’re looking for fast, inexpensive, systems to run Check Point’s VPN-1, the System x3650 might fit your bill.
| NetworkWorld, Inc. | About Network World, Inc. | Advertise | Careers | Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy | Reprints and links | Partnerships | Press room | Subscribe to NW |
| IDG, Inc. | CIO | Computerworld | CSO | Demo | GamePro | Games.net | IDGconnect.com | IDG World Expo | Infoworld | JavaWorld.com | LinuxWorld.com | MacUser | Macworld | PC World | Playlistmag.com | The Industry Standard | IDG List Services | IDG TechNetwork |
 |
Copyright © 1994-2008 Network World, Inc. All rights reserved. |
Partner Content
Brilliantly simple security and control solutions for email, web and endpoint
www.sophos.com
Stopping data leakage
Learn how to exploit your current security investment to control the information that flows into, through and out of your network.
Download the white paper.
Why detection rates aren't enough
Evaluating endpoint security products is a time-consuming and daunting task. Learn the six critical questions you need to ask prospective vendors to get the right endpoint solution.
Download the white paper.
Applications: taking back control
Employees installing unauthorized applications is a growing threat to business security and productivity. Cost-effectively reduce this threat by integrating control into your malware protection.
Learn more today.
Comments (2)
CoreXL is definitely newBy Joel Snyder on December 14, 2007, 7:14 amCoreXL is definitely new stuff, and I think that we were fortunate to get access to it as early as we did for this testing. I'm not sure that I'd use the word "cheating"...
Reply | Read entire comment
RE: IBM System x3650By Nick Coppock on December 12, 2007, 6:40 amThis result is of no surprise, Checkpoint cheated - The IBM system runs a technology called coreXL which Checkpoint have developed to make use of multi-core CPUs....
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments