Skip Links

Clear Choice Test Unified Threat Management Firewalls. All-in-one firewalls show spotty performance: Juniper, Cisco, Check Point lead the way in test of 13 unified threat management devices.
Intro to UTM Testing Testing categories Product Summaries Click tabs to expand

Watts up with power consumption?

Nokia, WatchGuard offer 'greenest' firewalls

By , Network World
November 12, 2007 12:07 AM ET

Network World - The data center may seem a big place, but watts are watts: Every one you use costs you money. Two firewalls in a high-availability pair may not be the biggest power expense in a computer room, but that's no excuse to waste wattage.

In our "green factor" testing, we found that Nokia's and WatchGuard Technologies' UTM firewalls certainly know how to pass packets without wasting money: Both draw less than 1 amp. As the overall winner in this category, the Nokia IP290 pair we tested used 1.0 amps under load and barely slipped past WatchGuard's Firebox Peak devices, using 10% less power overall.

The IP290s are especially green because of their space and size. Nokia fits two half-wide boxes in a single 1U mounting bracket. That's downright elegant, especially compared with some of the other devices we tested. In fact, two Nokia IP290 firewalls weigh less than the rack-mount kit for the Secure Computing Sidewinder UTMs. When you upgrade and replace your firewalls at the end of a five-year life cycle, you're going to be throwing out a lot more finished product that had to be mined, manufactured, shipped and ultimately recycled.

Tracking the green side of UTM firewalls

Gigabit firewalls range from the very efficient (Nokia and WatchGuard) to the very wasteful (IBM and Secure Computing) when it comes to power consumed and materials to manufacture the device. You can build a greener data center by choosing products with lower resource requirements.
 
In amps
Vendor Product Height Unloaded current use (two devices) Loaded current
use (two devices)
Astaro ASG 425a 1U 2.2 2.5
Check Point UTM-1 2050 1U 1.7 2.3
Cisco ASA5540 with SSM-20 IPS module 1U 2.1 2.5
Crossbeam C25 2U 3.5 4.2
Fortinet FortiGate 3600A 2U 3.5 3.8
IBM System x3650 2U 7.2 7.7
IBM/ISS Proventia MX5010 2U 5.0 5.5
Juniper Networks ISG-1000 3U 2.8 2.8
Juniper Networks SSG-520M 2U 2.3 2.3
Nokia IP290 1U 1.0 1.0
Secure Computing Sidewinder 2150D with IPS acceleration 2U 6.0 6.3
SonicWall Pro 5060 1U 1.7 1.9
WatchGuard Firebox Peak X8500e 1U 1.0 1.1
Click to see: Tracking the green side of UTM firewalls

In the doghouse for their high power use were the general-purpose servers from IBM (running Check Point software) and Secure Computing (running on Dell hardware), which pulled down 7.7 amps to 6.3 amps in our tests (and emitting a similarly disproportionate number of BTUs). The custom-built IBM Internet Security Systems' Proventia MX5010 also weighed in heavily in this category, pulling down 5.5 amps.

Latest News
rssRss Feed
View more Latest News