Apple’s newest server operating system release is likeable, but it’s not all that interesting.
REVIEWS
Top 10 things we love and hate about Leopard Server
Apple's Leopard connections prove very useful
Top 10 things we love and hate about Leopard Client
NEWS
Apple 'fixes' causing problems
Meet the Windows Server 2008 robot
Help on the way for SMB telephony reseller margins being squeezed to death by Cisco
E-Mail article
|
|
Print article
|
|
Contact author
|
Reprint
|
AIM article
|
del.icio.us |
Reddit
|
Digg
|
Stumble
|
Slashdot It!
|
Mac OS X Leopard Server 10.5 (we tested both 10.5 and 10.5.1) has a lot of the new and interesting eye candy Apple has become known for, but it is more about supporting incremental user productivity software advances than it is about large scale platform or functional advances.
Slideshow: Top 10 things we love and hate about Leopard Server
Newly added to this version are phased, wizard-like installation scripts that are designed to appeal to a less technical audience than say, one that typically installs a Linux back-end or Microsoft’s Small Business Server system. Leopard now points Mac OS X specifically towards smaller organizations and workgroups rather than the more open-ended prior releases.
Apple has paid attention to hardware performance improvements. Leopard supports 64-bit server platforms in identical fashion with the G4-based and Intel-based platforms.
And Apple has announced that it won’t mind if you virtualize Leopard (although there were no production virtualization schemes currently available for Leopard Server at the time of testing) as long as the virtual machine is also running on an Apple hardware platform. This tie-in between hardware and operating system reminds us of computing relationships of the 1980s, where operating systems were tied to hardware platforms in a very strict way. Apple’s competitors have all evolved away from these types of direct hardware/software binding ties. Some argue these ties make Apple’s platforms more stable. That’s laudable, but you pay for it in terms of device, communications and storage flexibility.
Our initial testing of Leopard’s Apple 10.5 turned up a long list of bugs ranging from authentication difficulties to searching issues to Windows networks linking problems, but there is no sense in going too deeply into those because most if not all are cured with the recommended (free) update, which was rolled out mid-November.
Note: Register to have your user name appear; otherwise your comment will show up as "Anonymous."
*Anonymous comments will only appear once they are approved by the moderator.
Copyright 2008 Network World Inc.
|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary [1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info [589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos] [407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"? [1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games [682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow] [578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX [1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow] [409]
Comprehensive Network & Voice Management Visit CA Network & Voice Management Resource Center and get insights into industry best practices, information that helps you to address your challenges.
Voice over IP (VoIP) has much to offer in cost savings but some customers have concerns about VoIP call quality compared to the quality of traditional voice services. This white paper will help you learn how to take the right steps so that voice quality is assured.
Managing your network is serious business. This paper discusses the benefits of integrating configuration change-awareness into your network fault management solution
Why so harsh on Time Machine? By Anonymous on December 10, 2007, 3:06 pm Reply | Read entire comment You seem awfully harsh on Time Machine, at least if the perjorative results from the three complaints you mention. I'm not sure what usage model you expect,...
Slightly faster and it gets a "NO GO"? By vasbinde on December 12, 2007, 4:43 am Reply | Read entire comment Yet if we speak about another company that shall remain nameless, whose OS gets substantially SLOWER with every release, we recommend upgrading?!?! Smells like...
Is this a joke? By Chuck on December 10, 2007, 4:57 pm Reply | Read entire comment We are actually using Leopard and have noticed some nice improvements, such as speed, nice work group features, and other enhancements, none of which appear in a...
All comments (6)