| Clear Choice Test Client Management | ||||||||
|
||||||||
The easy-to-set-up, complementary Kace KBox appliances worked in conjunction with each other to hit on a number of our most onerous desktop management chores. The KBox 1200 device handled software deployment, patch management, asset management, license tracking and vulnerability scans. The KBox 1200 also included a helpdesk feature for issuing and tracking trouble tickets. The KBox 2100 appliance deployed entire operating system images to our desktops.
Both Kace models feature a Web browser user interface for ongoing administrative use. However, installation required the temporary attachment of a keyboard and a monitor to the appliance in order to assign a local IP address. The browser-based interface, which uses a tab folder metaphor that didn't always operate as it should, took some getting used to, but was otherwise unremarkable. We noted that the appliances' administrative interfaces let us delegate different functions to different people, according to roles we set up. The grouping of managed clients, termed labeling by the vendor, is flexible enough to allow a client to be in multiple groups.
Pushing agents to our Windows clients was simply a matter of supplying an IP address range to the KBox 1200. We installed non-Windows clients agents manually via the 1200's Samba file server sharepoint utility. The model 1200's desktop management functions worked well with diverse client platforms: Windows, Mac OS X, Solaris and Linux.The company claims that its product can manage virtual machines running along side of physical client machines, but that is not apparent in any documentation sent to us by Kace, therefore we did not test that claim.
The KBox 1200's inventory of our clients was quick and accurate, taking only a couple of hours to identify every machine and tally each PC's internals. We especially liked the way its asset management and license tracking features let us relate those assets and licenses to particular organizational groups (such as departments or divisions of a company). When we set up a "per use" license (as opposed to a "per seat" license), we were able to use the 1200's software metering feature to ensure that we didn't exceed the usage threshold specified in the license. The model 1200 flawlessly distributed and later upgraded a number of applications across our network, and its patch management kept our Windows and Mac clients perfectly up to date. The unit's vulnerability scan, which is based on the Open Vulnerability and Assessment Language, is closely integrated with the product's patch management faculties.
Partner Content
NetScout and analyst Jim Metzler have teamed to deliver a series of IT Briefs on Network and Application Performance Management leveraging research from NetScout's nGenius & Sniffer users.
www.netscout.com
Metzler on Service Delivery Management
Delivering IT business value by evolving our thinking from managing application performance to focusing on services.
Learn More
2009 Handbook of Application Delivery
Successful IT organizations must know how to make the right application delivery decisions in these tough economic times.
Download the Handbook
Metzler on the Modern IP Network
Discusses the growing emphasis on network management and the need to implement a holistic view of the end-to-end experience of the user.
Read the Brief