- Microsoft Windows chief decries standards grandstanding
- The 5 best, and 5 worst, features of Google Chrome OS
- Federal government using PS3 to crack pedophile passwords
- 10G Ethernet cheat sheet
- Top 10 free Windows tools for IT pros, at a glance
| Clear Choice Test Client Management | ||||||||
|
||||||||
In an age where every worker in your force has at least one client machine at his disposal at all times, it's an IT imperative to apply the same management standards to these varied, distributed machines as you would to your server and network components in order to keep them operational to a five-nines level.
The ideal client manager is a multi-faceted set of tools that automates client administration responsibilities across a broad range of client types. Longtime standard components of this toolbox include operating system and application version control features such as operating system image distribution, operating system configuration and recovery, remote application installation and patch management. This combined set of functions helps administrators automate these time-consuming and error-prone administrative tasks. Likewise, automated asset inventory and management tools as well as license metering software can help with new compliance regulations. Remote control access to client machines, for either repair or for training purposes, can save a significant amount of support time and travel expenses. Backup and recovery of desktop files can save scads of user and administration time.
Some of the new tricks offered by client management wares since we last tested comprise links to antimalware tools and vulnerability analysis engines and the abilities to manage mobile devices, detect USB port usage to alert administrators to the users who bring "memory sticks" into the office, provide both network access control and some host-based intrusion detection.
In this test of client management tools, while we invited more almost 20 vendors to join in, six agreed to stand up and be judged in our lab: Kace with its two complementary appliances, the KBox 1200 and KBox 2100; LANDesk with its LANDesk Management Suite 8.8; Novell with its ZENworks 10.0, and Symantec submitted its Total Management Suite 6.5 and Security Expressions 4.0, along with a copy of the Endpoint Protection 11.0 antimalware tool. From ScriptLogic, we downloaded its Desktop Authority 7.7 and from Aagon's site we downloaded ACMP 3.3. The other vendors we invited (AdventNet, Attachmate, BMC, CA, Centennial Software, Configuresoft, HP, IBM, Microsoft, NetSupport, New Boundary, Solarwinds and Touchpaper) declined to participate for a variety of reasons. Some were between versions, while others didn't want to compete because their products didn't offer features in each and every category we wanted to test.
In scoring these products for this test, we gave heavy weighting to the old standbys of desktop management: License tracking, asset inventory and operating system, application and patch distribution. These processes have been around long enough for us to press vendors for both a high level of accuracy and manageability. We also gave our standard weighting to administrative ease of use, installation processes and documentation as all are paramount to getting these products up and running in the first place. We separated out the client security features (including antimalware tool integration, vulnerability threat tool ties, host intrusion-prevention system and network access control capabilities) from the final other features category (which takes into account virtual machine management, remote control capabilities, mobile device management, USB device management and backup and recovery) because of the specialized nature of the former group.
Comments (33)
RE: LANDesk wins client management shootoutBy Fred Dunn on February 4, 2008, 4:09 pmYes it does, but the cost for LANDesk is prohibitive. We would love to have LANDesk but we are a University so LANDesk is out of our reach. When you compare systems...
Reply | Read entire comment
KBOX??By Chris Blake on February 5, 2008, 1:36 pmWe've been using the KBOX 1000 and 2000 for years. We chose them based on ease of deployment, ease of use, and top-notch support. I'm not convinced the reviewer...
Reply | Read entire comment
Dartmouth College has beenBy Timothy B. Chiacchira on February 5, 2008, 2:31 pmDartmouth College has been using LANDesk for several years now and we absolutely love the product. While I agree there is a premium for this amazing product it is...
Reply | Read entire comment
LANDesk is an excellent product and its pricing is affordableBy Timothy B. Chiacchira on February 5, 2008, 2:32 pmDartmouth College has been using LANDesk for several years now and we absolutely love the product. While I agree there is a premium for this amazing product it is...
Reply | Read entire comment
KBOX works!By Jim Root on February 5, 2008, 5:47 pmI have to agree with Chris Blake concerning this review. We have both KBOX appliances and I am not kidding when I say the worked right out of the box (no pun intended)....
Reply | Read entire comment
I too feel that the writersBy Doug Woodberry on February 6, 2008, 9:11 amI too feel that the writers did not get into everything KBOX has to offer. I came from a Landesk background and I am Landesk certified. It is a great tool but it...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments