- Insider threat looms large in San Francisco
- Woman fired over death threat
- IT admin pleads not guilty
- Tape storage gets more dense
- Top 10 worst uses for Windows
News | Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS
Microsoft's long-awaited Windows Server 2008 delivers advancements in speed, security and management, but its virtualization and network-access control features come up short.
In our testing of Windows Server 2008 gold code – the product officially launches on Wednesday – we found that Microsoft has made a number of improvements to its flagship server operating system.
For example, new server administrative role schemes boost security, the Server Manager program improves manageability, Internet Information Server (IIS) Web management functionality is revamped, Active Directory is easier to control, and Windows Terminal Services has been redesigned. Windows Server 2008 is also significantly faster than Windows Server 2003, especially when client machines are running Vista.
Unfortunately, a highly anticipated feature of Windows Server 2008, the Hyper-V server virtualization tool, is missing. Microsoft includes a beta version of Hyper-V with Windows Server 2008 editions, but it will not release final code until the third quarter of this year.
Also missing is compatibility between non-Windows (and older Windows) clients and Microsoft's Network Access Protection (NAP) scheme, Microsoft's version of NAC.
The Microsoft NAP scheme uses client-side 'health certificates' to either give or deny clients access to the network An 'unhealthy' client is vectored to remediation servers for necessary antivirus updates or security patches (compare NAC products.).
We tested the NAP scheme as implemented in Windows Server 2008 and found that it works as long as the client is running Windows XP or Vista. (See sidebar.) But it won't let clients running any other brand of operating system have access to its protected resources, thus hampering the potential success of the NAP scheme, because all client types must be vetted for NAC to work effectively.
Microsoft wants administrators of Windows Server 2008 editions (it will ship in the usual flavors of Standard, Enterprise, Data Center and Itanium-specific code) to think of the server as playing certain roles. Server roles are aggregated objects that suit commonly thought-of services, such as print services, file sharing, DNS, DHCP, Active Directory Domain Controller and IIS-based Web services. Microsoft has defined 18 roles in all.
Intel...I guarantee you will never ever see a customer using Wimax the way it was laid out by Intel 6...- Anonymous
Partner Content
CA Network & Voice Resource Center
Comprehensive Network & Voice Management Visit CA Network & Voice Management Resource Center and get insights into industry best practices, information that helps you to address your challenges.
CA Network & Voice Management Resource Center
Managing Voice Over IP for Successful Convergence
Voice over IP (VoIP) has much to offer in cost savings but some customers have concerns about VoIP call quality compared to the quality of traditional voice services. This white paper will help you learn how to take the right steps so that voice quality is assured.
Managing VoIP for Successful Convergence
The Changing Face of Network Management
Managing your network is serious business. This paper discusses the benefits of integrating configuration change-awareness into your network fault management solution
Download Whitepaper
Comments (10)
Here, Here!By Anon on June 29, 2008, 10:36 pmWell, fancy pants C64 dude, in MY company, we use a Commodore Pet using the Pet-a-Linux distro to do all our heavy lifting. In fact, my IT Director got a hernia...
Reply | Read entire comment
Upgrade - SmupgradeBy Anonymous on June 9, 2008, 3:16 pmWe are using the Commodore 64 here at my company and I agree - upgrades are only for those who want to play that game. Guess what - We do not have any Anti-Virus...
Reply | Read entire comment
2008 ServerBy Anonymous on March 3, 2008, 10:04 amwho cares, more junk in the trunk. Like Vista nobody needs it just those who want to play the " lets upgrade game ". We will live without it and the next one too.
Reply | Read entire comment
A "feature"By hannulai on February 29, 2008, 9:07 amnice article. I've used win2k8 for some time now and noticed that MSDN version has a"feature" or something that slows network down BADLY after 2 days uptime.. wonder...
Reply | Read entire comment
Linux antivirusBy Don Marti on February 26, 2008, 11:36 amAV matters for Linux because Linux can still forward a Windows virus to a vulnerable system. So there are several proprietary AV solutions for Linux, plus ClamAV,...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments