Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

(Comma separation for multiple addresses)
Your Message:

Juniper switch proves to be credible choice

Review shows the EX 4200 to be fast, feature-rich and manageable
By David Newman, Network World Lab Alliance, Network World
July 14, 2008 12:10 AM ET
  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Cisco take note: Juniper's new EX 4200 switch not only fills a hole in a leading competitor's product line, but also represents a credible alternative for enterprise access switching.


How we tested Juniper's EX 4200
A slideshow of the product
Archive of Network World tests

In Network World's exclusive Clear Choice test, we subjected the EX 4200-48T switch to the same rigorous battery of benchmarks we used to assess seven other vendors' 10G Ethernet access switches earlier this year. (See comparative 10G Ethernet switch test.)

The verdict: This is one fast box. The EX 4200 delivered line-rate throughput in every case, the only switch we've tested this year to do so. What's more, 10G Ethernet latency is the lowest we've ever measured. We also were impressed by the EX 4200's feature set and powerful JUNOS command-line interface (CLI).

That's not to suggest Cisco and others should fold up their tents, though. This is Juniper's first effort in enterprise switching, and that inexperience shows in a few places. Multicast support is still a bit rough, and our tests also uncovered a couple of security concerns. Still, this is an impressive device, especially for a first try. (Compare products.)

We tested the $16,800 EX 4200-48T, which offers 48 10/100/1000Mbps gigabit ports, two 10G Ethernet ports, PoE capability on 8 ports, and stacking capability for up to 10 switches. Juniper also offers the EX 4200-48P with 48 ports of PoE capacity from a single power supply for $18,400. Both devices offer optional redundant power supplies and support virtually all switching and routing protocols (see Features spreadsheet).

Faster still

In access switch tests earlier this year we found throughput no longer is the differentiator as it once was, with most boxes pushing packets either nearly at, or within one percent of, line rate.

With Juniper's EX 4200, there's no need to say "nearly". Even under the heaviest loads our Spirent TestCenter traffic generator threw at it, the switch delivered line-rate throughput in every single unicast and multicast test, both in layer-2 and layer-3 configurations. No other switch did that.

Latency – often a more important metric than throughput, especially for time-sensitive voice and video traffic – was low and consistent across all tests. Measured at line rate, the Juniper switch delayed 64-byte frames across 10G Ethernet links for an average of 1.96 microsec and a maximum of 2.01 microsec.

Those are the lowest latencies we've ever recorded in an Ethernet switch. In fact, even the maximum latency of the EX 4200 is less than the lowest average result we measured in the previous round of tests.

With large 1,518-byte frames, latencies hovered in the 2 to 3 microsec range on 10G Ethernet ports and in the 20 to 30 microsec range on gigabit Ethernet ports. The gigabit numbers are either comparable to or better than most other switches we've tested; the 10G Ethernet latencies, again, set record lows.

Multicast latency also hovered in the low microseconds, compared with numbers that in some cases were dozens of times higher in previous tests. The Juniper switch won't hold up traffic long enough to adversely affect the performance of any enterprise application.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Comments (18)
Login
Forgot your account info?

Line rate swine rateBy Schratboy on July 14, 2008, 9:12 amReally, all the feeds and speeds in the world don't make for a secure, compliant or productive network. All this fixation with speed is just more seduction and subterfuge...

Reply | Read entire comment

goodbye CiscoBy Anonymous on July 14, 2008, 4:36 pmThe EX4200 is the beginning of the end of Cisco's dominance in the switching space. It is about time that we get a credible 2nd player in this space. Now that...

Reply | Read entire comment

Always,,, the same problemBy Anonymous on July 14, 2008, 9:36 pmFloks,,, the same problem. Local Support for diferents country. Juniper have big problem with the local support. The same problem!!! for all of your products...

Reply | Read entire comment

Juniper switch faster than Cisco switch. But...By Persistant on July 15, 2008, 8:58 amI am pleased to see that Cisco is now challenged. This promises a new great battle to the benefits of all customers. I still wonder how many companies will play...

Reply | Read entire comment

you've always had a credible 2nd playerBy Sebastian-PGP on July 15, 2008, 2:12 pm...in the switching space (Extreme), they just don't have the marketing budget or breadth of product that Juniper has.

Reply | Read entire comment

What complete strategy? TheBy Anon on July 15, 2008, 3:08 pmWhat complete strategy? The only thing Cisco switches have in common is the brand name. What does a Cisco "package" do for me that I can't get with other vendors...

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed