Products take multiple paths to interoperability
Simple OS and storage connectivity not an issue, support for load balancing measures is
By
Joel Snyder
,
Network World
, 07/28/2008
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
With iSCSI SAN servers called upon to serve many different operating systems at the same time, an initial concern for any deployment is
simple interoperability: Do these products work with different operating systems?
We tested each iSCSI SAN server with three very common use cases. We deployed them in a test environment with software initiators for Microsoft Windows Server 2008 and Centos 5 Linux, and a hardware initiator from QLogic. In iSCSI terminology
"initiator" is the network equivalent to client, while "target" is the network equivalent to server. We'll use "virtual disk"
instead of target to help keep things clear. Our results show many different models for how iSCSI initiators and virtual disk
targets authenticate, load balance and interact.
Basic operating system interoperability was fine for all products tested. And we were able to connect and exchange data with
the three different initiators -- eventually. Three products gave us some headaches along the way, though. The Nexsan SATAbeast
and the Kano NetCOR 7500 systems both required software upgrades before they worked properly. The Kano NetCOR 7500 reacted
to our Qlogic hardware initiators by actually crashing the controllers. Because the Kano NetCOR 7500 has dual controllers
acting as a high-availability pair, one controller would crash and the other would take over, but the whole system never completely
stopped working, even as the crash-takeover-reboot cycle kept repeating itself. The Nexsan SATAbeast didn't work well with
Windows Server 2008 when we ran it with multiple data paths, refusing to connect to Windows some of the time. A firmware upgrade
downloaded from the Nexsan Web site solved that problem.
We encountered a more subtle problem working with the Compellent StorageCenter on Windows 2008. Compellent uses a model for
disk space where its products transparently allocate disk from various parts of the subsystem based on performance. When a
new virtual disk drive is created and quickly filled with data, there may be system delays while the Compellent controller
gathers array space. Compellent engineers advised us to edit the Windows registry settings to increase disk timeouts to resolve
the problem.
The ensuing interoperability challenges we then encountered all focused on a single area: making the connection between the
iSCSI initiator and iSCSI target fast and reliable.
Partner Content
www.bmc.com
Gartner 2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling
Gartner has positioned BMC CONTROL-M in the Leaders Quadrant of their "2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling." The report assesses the ability to execute and completeness of vision of key vendors in the marketplace. Read a full copy today, courtesy of BMC Software.
Download whitepaper
Dell's SMART Approach to Workload Automation
Read a compelling case study by EMA, Inc. to learn how Dell uses BMC CONTROL-M to cut cost and increase productivity with workload automation.
Download whitepaper
Workload Automation Cost Savings 2 Minute Video
A major computer manufacturer uses BMC CONTROL-M and just four people to schedule and run over 85,000 jobs every month. By switching to BMC CONTROL-M, they more than quadrupled the workload without adding a single staff member. See how in this 2-minute video overview.
Go to video
Comment