- How to use electrical outlets and cheap lasers to steal data
- The botnet world is booming
- NTIA seeks volunteers to review broadband applications
- The 10 dumbest mistakes network managers make
- What's driving this university to IPv6? Going green
Nexsan SATABeast
Test Score: 3.1 out of 5
Editor's note: This is a summary of our testing of this product, for a full rundown of how it fared in our testing across iSCSI SAN Server categories; please see our full coverage.
The SATABeast is a 3U high chassis with 42 SATA drives, giving it the highest density of any system we tested, by far. The chassis also accommodates two controllers, providing integrated high availability.
Fundamentally, the SATABeast is a density product built for a company that really wants a lot of storage for a few servers at a reasonable price with above-average performance. However, the SATABeast is missing a number of enterprise features, such as snapshots, backups and thin provisioning, as well as some essential basic features, such as device authentication.
Combine the lack of features beyond basic iSCSI disk service with a poor initial security posture, and it's clear that the design goal for the SATABeast is an environment where ultra-high capacity is the critical requirement and everything else is less important. For example, the SATABeast can be ordered in a "Mac flavor", with a face plate matching Apple's own Xserve style, suggesting that customers with needs for huge amounts of video storage and manipulation will find the SATABeast a good option.
Nexsan's innovative power saving technology is another big plus for the product, and especially appropriate given the large number of disks included in the device. It's unlikely that a normal customer would see the 50% power savings that we saw, as that would mean that the entire array was idle, but it is great to see a company put development effort into reducing total energy consumption.
The SATABeast turned in great performance for a SATA device. We were suspicious that a single gigabit Ethernet port per controller dedicated to iSCSI traffic would do a good job, but the combination of many drives spinning at once gave the SATABeast a No. 1 ranking among SATA-based devices in 10 of 12 performance metrics.
Enterprises looking for more than a big pile of disks will find that the SATABeast won't meet their needs very well. However, if you do need maximum density and a moderate price, the SATABeast has little competition.
Partner Content
Explore the Ultrium Edge
The powerful tape technology can address data security with tape encryption as well as long term data protection.
Find Out More
Disk and Tape Square Off
Discover what disk and tape really cost and which solution provides lower total cost of ownership and optimizes energy use for your organization
Download this White Paper
Don't Fall for the Myths
The Clipper Group explores the truth behind the myths of tape, digging into the misconceptions in the disk vs. tape debate.
Review this information
information examination
An examination of information security issues, methods and securing data with LTO-4 tape drive encryption
Read this analysis
Comments (2)
Two ports: but one is needed for managementBy Joel Snyder on July 31, 2008, 9:16 amIn our testing, we wanted a separate management plane from data plane, so we used one port for every device that had at least two for management. That only left...
Reply | Read entire comment
SATABeast has two iSCSI portsBy Anonymous on July 29, 2008, 4:22 pmActually, each RAID controller in a SATABeast has two iSCSI ports, in addition to the two Fibre Channel ports. Use all 8 ports and it's a buttload faster than you...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments