Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

Clear Choice Test

iSCSI SAN servers

Introduction|Scorecard|How we did it|Slideshow|Test archive

Nexsan SATABeast

By Joel Snyder , Network World , 07/28/2008
Newsletter Signup
  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Nexsan SATABeast
Test Score: 3.1 out of 5

Editor's note: This is a summary of our testing of this product, for a full rundown of how it fared in our testing across iSCSI SAN Server categories; please see our full coverage.

The SATABeast is a 3U high chassis with 42 SATA drives, giving it the highest density of any system we tested, by far. The chassis also accommodates two controllers, providing integrated high availability.

Fundamentally, the SATABeast is a density product built for a company that really wants a lot of storage for a few servers at a reasonable price with above-average performance. However, the SATABeast is missing a number of enterprise features, such as snapshots, backups and thin provisioning, as well as some essential basic features, such as device authentication.

Combine the lack of features beyond basic iSCSI disk service with a poor initial security posture, and it's clear that the design goal for the SATABeast is an environment where ultra-high capacity is the critical requirement and everything else is less important. For example, the SATABeast can be ordered in a "Mac flavor", with a face plate matching Apple's own Xserve style, suggesting that customers with needs for huge amounts of video storage and manipulation will find the SATABeast a good option.

Nexsan's innovative power saving technology is another big plus for the product, and especially appropriate given the large number of disks included in the device. It's unlikely that a normal customer would see the 50% power savings that we saw, as that would mean that the entire array was idle, but it is great to see a company put development effort into reducing total energy consumption.

The SATABeast turned in great performance for a SATA device. We were suspicious that a single gigabit Ethernet port per controller dedicated to iSCSI traffic would do a good job, but the combination of many drives spinning at once gave the SATABeast a No. 1 ranking among SATA-based devices in 10 of 12 performance metrics.

Enterprises looking for more than a big pile of disks will find that the SATABeast won't meet their needs very well. However, if you do need maximum density and a moderate price, the SATABeast has little competition.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print
Partner Content

Explore the Ultrium Edge

The powerful tape technology can address data security with tape encryption as well as long term data protection.

Find Out More

Disk and Tape Square Off

Discover what disk and tape really cost and which solution provides lower total cost of ownership and optimizes energy use for your organization

Download this White Paper

Don't Fall for the Myths

The Clipper Group explores the truth behind the myths of tape, digging into the misconceptions in the disk vs. tape debate.

Review this information

information examination

An examination of information security issues, methods and securing data with LTO-4 tape drive encryption

Read this analysis

Comments (2)
Login
Forgot your account info?

Two ports: but one is needed for managementBy Joel Snyder on July 31, 2008, 9:16 amIn our testing, we wanted a separate management plane from data plane, so we used one port for every device that had at least two for management. That only left...

Reply | Read entire comment

SATABeast has two iSCSI portsBy Anonymous on July 29, 2008, 4:22 pmActually, each RAID controller in a SATABeast has two iSCSI ports, in addition to the two Fibre Channel ports. Use all 8 ports and it's a buttload faster than you...

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed