Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

Clear Choice Test

iSCSI SAN servers

Introduction|Scorecard|How we did it|Slideshow|Test archive

Dell, LeftHand, NetApp score highest in performance testing

By Joel Snyder , Network World , 07/28/2008
Newsletter Signup
  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

There is no messier can of worms to open than one containing a disk I/O performance benchmark. Performance is difficult to measure, because there are few trustworthy tools. Performance is also difficult to characterize, because every application (and even versions of the same application) uses the file system differently. And small configuration changes within either the test tool or the iSCSI server can lead to substantial changes in performance.

Rather than try and identify the fastest iSCSI subsystem, we focused on four sets of performance-related questions:

• First, how does iSCSI compare to locally attached disk storage? Is iSCSI fast enough to replace internal disks, or does the network act as a bottleneck?

• Second, how does iSCSI over Gigabit Ethernet perform? Is there a requirement for multiple connections to each iSCSI initiator? Is Ethernet a bottleneck? Does iSCSI need to be shelved until 10G Ethernet is widely available?

• Third, is there reason to pay extra money for Serial-Attached SCSI (SAS) drives compared with Serial ATA (SATA) drives?

• Finally, are there some general observations we can make about which iSCSI servers are faster than others?

To get a baseline, we ran basic benchmarks on locally connected SCSI drives. Each network and application server in our test bed had two internal 10K RPM SCSI drives, and we ran the same benchmarks across four servers with local drives that we would later run across the LAN to the iSCSI servers under test (see How we tested).

Results show that a single server talking to local disks would generally see lower levels of performance than the same single server running the same benchmark to an iSCSI SAN device. If you simply replaced internal disks on a single server with a iSCSI SAN server, even the slowest device tested would be faster than the local disks.

Of course, these iSCSI servers are designed to serve many servers at once, and you wouldn't buy a whole iSCSI server for a single application server. Because our test bed had four servers, we ran the same test with four servers hitting the iSCSI array at once. In that case, the sum of all eight local drives in all four servers turned in a more respectable performance when compared with iSCSI over Gigabit Ethernet, because the local disk performance scaled linearly. When four servers with local drives were compared with the iSCSI servers we tested, they placed in the bottom third of our results: nine of the iSCSI SAN servers were still faster, but five were slower.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print
Partner Content

Explore the Ultrium Edge

The powerful tape technology can address data security with tape encryption as well as long term data protection.

Find Out More

Disk and Tape Square Off

Discover what disk and tape really cost and which solution provides lower total cost of ownership and optimizes energy use for your organization

Download this White Paper

Don't Fall for the Myths

The Clipper Group explores the truth behind the myths of tape, digging into the misconceptions in the disk vs. tape debate.

Review this information

information examination

An examination of information security issues, methods and securing data with LTO-4 tape drive encryption

Read this analysis

Comments (1)
Login
Forgot your account info?

Near-line SAS drivesBy Anonymous on August 4, 2008, 6:35 pmA new development is that the disks that used to be exclusive to SATA are now available with SAS interfaces, so you now have the capacity of the SATA drives with...

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed