Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

(Comma separation for multiple addresses)
Your Message:

Clear Choice Test

Messaging platforms

Introduction | Scorecard | Opinion: Stay with Exchange or not?
How we did it | Slideshow | Test archive

Exchange alternatives: Pros and cons

Testing shows Microsoft's Exchange still tops for features and management hooks.
By Joel Snyder , Network World , 03/09/2009
  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

For many enterprises, Exchange is synonymous with corporate e-mail.


Screen shots of front ends, back ends of Exchange alternatives
How we tested the Exchange alternatives
Archive of Network World tests

The one-two punch of Exchange server on the back end and Outlook e-mail client on the desktop has allowed Microsoft to pull down 65% of the enterprise messaging market. (Compare messaging products.)

However, with the release of Exchange 2007, Microsoft opened the door for some substantial competition. The upgrade costs, hardware requirements, and hassles of jumping to the latest version have many businesses asking: "Is Microsoft still the right answer?"

In this Clear Choice Test, we explore how Exchange alternatives stack up against Microsoft's offer, as well as each other.
Our testing focuses on products for midsized deployments of 1,000 mailboxes or less. We tested six Exchange alternatives: CommuniGate Pro (CommuniGate Systems), Kerio MailServer (Kerio Technologies), MDaemon Pro (Alt-N Technologies), MailSite Fusion (MailSite), Scalix Enterprise Edition (Scalix, a Xandros company), and Zimbra Collaboration Suite, Professional Edition (Zimbra, a Yahoo company).

We installed and tested each, focusing on client and mobility support, scalability up to a moderate number of users, ease of use, and support for compliance and legal discovery features.

While all were rock solid when it came to basic tasks such as sending and retrieving messages, there were key differences when it came to manageability and product integration, support for different clients, and system performance.

While there are places where our Exchange alternatives outdo Exchange -- such as in price/performance, Macintosh interoperability, and manageability for mid-sized deployments -- Exchange still beats the competition in many areas because it offers a range of features that aren't easy to find in the third-party market.

While it's difficult to point to one overall best product among the Exchange alternatives, there are clear strengths and differences based on features supported and product style.

Our top scorers, Kerio MailServer and Zimbra Collaboration Suite, offer a good combination of multi-platform interoperability, a good end-user experience and solid Outlook integration. While each has faults, these are good starting points for anyone looking for an alternative to Exchange. Other products in our test also have special areas of expertise, such as CommuniGate Pro's VoIP integration and high performance. This breadth of options bodes well for any system manager looking for a different path.

While MailSite Fusion and Scalix both had high points, both also had significant drawbacks for the midsized deployment. Scalix's lack of integrated management makes it more appropriate to very large deployments where a technical staff is available to handle the increased operational burden, and MailSite Fusion's lack of a MAPI connector knocked it out for any business wanting to keep the high-quality Outlook experience.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Comments (40)
Login
Forgot your account info?

What about Oracle's Beehive Collaboration suite? It has a good outlook integration and a host of open standard features...By Anonymous on March 9, 2009, 5:26 pmWhat about Oracle's Beehive Collaboration suite? It has a good outlook integration and a host of open standard features. Based on the concept of workspaces, I...

Reply | Read entire comment

Limited testing results in limited resultsBy Anon on March 9, 2009, 6:58 pmI have to disagree on the assumption that Microsoft Outlook is the best and therefore the exclusive e-mail client that could be selected. It's propensity for failure...

Reply | Read entire comment

Yes, which is why we tested with multiple clientsBy Joel Snyder on March 9, 2009, 7:42 pmI agree, but I don't understand why you think this is the only way we tested. Perhaps you didn't read the test. We tested with Outlook, which is a requirement...

Reply | Read entire comment

Novell Groupwise, still the one for me...By Anonymous on March 9, 2009, 9:16 pmScalable, secure, robust, and just darn good... How many can say that their mailserver has been up for months or years... I can because Groupwise is our collaboration...

Reply | Read entire comment

Open X-ChangeBy Anonymous on March 10, 2009, 8:53 amAlternatives to Exchange, but never considered Open X-Change? http://www.open-xchange.com Has all the features mentioned, plus has an community (free) edition....

Reply | Read entire comment

novell groupwiseBy Anon on March 10, 2009, 8:58 amin addition to being scalable, robust and very reliable, very easy to manage. one person a few hours a week can easily manage hundreds of accounts.

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed