Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

(Comma separation for multiple addresses)
Your Message:

Cisco IPS 7.0 raises the bar

New global threat correlation feature boosts effectiveness of intrusion prevention devices
By Joel Snyder , Network World , 08/10/2009
  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Cisco is shipping what it claims is the first intrusion-prevention system (IPS) to correlate IP reputation filtering with signature-based intrusion prevention sensors.


How we tested Cisco's IPS
Archive of Network World tests

We tested the software upgrade to Cisco's shipping IPS hardware and appliances and found that not only has Cisco increased the value of its IPS in preventing attacks, it has done so in a way that any security manager can easily and intuitively deploy in just minutes.

While there are the rough edges and blank spots you'd expect in any new release, Cisco has set the bar pretty high with this release.

When Cisco acquired Ironport in 2007, it got a hidden gem in the deal: SenderBase, which is Ironport's IP address reputation service. SenderBase originally focused on spam sources, but when Ironport's moved into the Web security gateway business it refocused SenderBase as a more generic service that addressed spam, malware and viruses.

Cisco has taken the SenderBase technology and created yet another reputation service, Cisco SensorBase, which is accessible in the IPS 7.0 software release. We found that SensorBase is tightly integrated with the IPS and, as our testing shows, actually works. (See story on how SensorBase works.)

Security managers can use SensorBase data in two ways. Reputation filtering lets you block all traffic from IP addresses with an extremely bad reputation. This is done regardless of traffic type -- all traffic from these sites will be blocked.

This basic use of reputation filters isn't new, but what's interesting is that Cisco will use this reputation data to change the Risk Rating of security events identified by the IPS. In other words, an event linked to a 'bad' IP address will result in an even higher Risk Rating.

"Risk Rating" is a Cisco-proprietary value, from 0 to 100, that is computed for every event identified by the IPS. Risk Rating lets you prioritize events and decide what to look at and what to ignore.

Prior to IPS 7.0, Risk Rating was computed using six main factors, such as value of the asset being attacked, the danger of the attack, the match between the attack and the target operating system, the quality of the signature, and so on. With IPS 7.0, another factor can be thrown into the mix: the reputation of the attacker as determined by Cisco's SensorBase.

Testing Global Correlation Inspection

In Cisco's IPS products, every event has a Risk Rating and the security manager generally defines three bands of risks: low, medium, and high. For each of the bands, you can then select a set of actions, from logging that an event occurred to actively blocking all traffic from a particular IP address for some period of time. Risk Ratings aren't new — what's new is the addition of reputation information in 7.0.

Global Correlation Inspection raises the Risk Rating for any event when one of the IP addresses involved has a bad reputation.

The difference between Reputation Filtering and Global Correlation Inspection is pretty important: with Reputation Filtering turned on, an extremely bad reputation of -10 will cause all traffic to be dropped. With Global Correlation Inspection turned on, bad reputations will only cause Risk Ratings of events to be raised.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Comments (9)
Login
Forgot your account info?

Wow, imagine that Joel Synder loves CiscoBy Anonymous on August 11, 2009, 6:29 pmI think Cisco could sell a box full of yarn and Joel would give it a positive review. "Cisco's YarnBox 2.0 is increasing the value that high performance organizations...

Reply | Read entire comment

And on the contrary, Cisco can cure cancer and some "analysts" wBy Anonymous on August 12, 2009, 10:43 amAnd on the contrary, Cisco can cure cancer and some "analysts" will say Cisco added "too much latency". I haven't seen anything close to this type of inovation...

Reply | Read entire comment

Seriously... YamBox 2.0?By Anonymous on August 12, 2009, 11:25 amProps for creativity on the name... but have the awareness and incite to understand a powerful tool in the world of security monitoring and threat mitigation. Cisco's...

Reply | Read entire comment

This feature belongs with URL filtering and part of your mail seBy Anonymous on August 12, 2009, 11:41 amThis feature belongs with URL filtering and part of your mail server, not an IPS. Since the Cisco IPS suxed to begin with anything is worth mentioning to promote...

Reply | Read entire comment

Your an idiot. 10 years agoBy Anon on August 12, 2009, 11:49 amYour an idiot. 10 years ago Cisco said stateful inspection was "good enough". The IPS was developed in the last 10 years, why would a semi useless feature like IP...

Reply | Read entire comment

Joel, what a poor example...By Anonymous on August 12, 2009, 11:56 amJoel, what a poor example.; Normally I would recommend a Web Application Firewall for that, not an IPS. Also, there are more specific IPS devices for clients as...

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed